public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf: attach a module BTF to a bpf_struct_ops
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:14:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913061449.1918219-4-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913061449.1918219-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Every struct_ops type should has an associated module BTF to provide type
information since we are going to allow modules to define and register new
struct_ops types. New types may exist only in module itself, and the kernel
BTF (vmlinux) doesn't know it at all. The attached module BTF here will be
used to resolve type IDs of a struct_ops map.
---
 include/linux/bpf.h         |  5 +++--
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c       |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 10f98f0ddc77..a9369f982cd5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1614,6 +1614,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
 	void (*unreg)(void *kdata);
 	int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
 	int (*validate)(void *kdata);
+	const struct btf *btf;
 	const struct btf_type *type;
 	const struct btf_type *value_type;
 	const char *name;
@@ -1629,7 +1630,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_mod {
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
 #define BPF_MODULE_OWNER ((void *)((0xeB9FUL << 2) + POISON_POINTER_DELTA))
-const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id);
+const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id, struct btf *btf);
 void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
 bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata);
 void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata);
@@ -1672,7 +1673,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 			    union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
 #endif
 #else
-static inline const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id)
+static inline const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id, struct btf *btf)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 9be6e07ccba5..82cc3f0638fa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
 			pr_warn("Error in init bpf_struct_ops %s\n",
 				st_ops->name);
 		} else {
+			/* XXX: We need a owner (module) here to company
+			 * with type_id and value_id.
+			 */
+			st_ops->btf = btf;
 			st_ops->type_id = type_id;
 			st_ops->type = t;
 			st_ops->value_id = value_id;
@@ -328,7 +332,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_bpf_struct_ops);
 extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
 
 static const struct bpf_struct_ops *
-bpf_struct_ops_find_value(u32 value_id)
+bpf_struct_ops_find_value(u32 value_id, struct btf *btf)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -336,14 +340,15 @@ bpf_struct_ops_find_value(u32 value_id)
 		return NULL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < bpf_struct_ops_num; i++) {
-		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->value_id == value_id)
+		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->value_id == value_id &&
+		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf)
 			return bpf_struct_ops[i];
 	}
 
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id)
+const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id, struct btf *btf)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -351,7 +356,8 @@ const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id)
 		return NULL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < bpf_struct_ops_num; i++) {
-		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->type_id == type_id)
+		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->type_id == type_id &&
+		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf)
 			return bpf_struct_ops[i];
 	}
 
@@ -423,7 +429,7 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_put_progs(struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map)
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
+static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
 {
 	const struct btf_member *member;
 	u32 i, moff, msize, prev_mend = 0;
@@ -435,8 +441,8 @@ static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
 		    memchr_inv(data + prev_mend, 0, moff - prev_mend))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, member->type);
-		mtype = btf_resolve_size(btf_vmlinux, mtype, &msize);
+		mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+		mtype = btf_resolve_size(btf, mtype, &msize);
 		if (IS_ERR(mtype))
 			return PTR_ERR(mtype);
 		prev_mend = moff + msize;
@@ -489,7 +495,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = st_map->st_ops;
 	struct bpf_struct_ops_value *uvalue, *kvalue;
 	const struct btf_member *member;
-	const struct btf_type *t = st_ops->type;
+	const struct btf_type *t;
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks;
 	void *udata, *kdata;
 	int prog_fd, err;
@@ -499,15 +505,20 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	if (flags)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!st_ops)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	t = st_ops->type;
+
 	if (*(u32 *)key != 0)
 		return -E2BIG;
 
-	err = check_zero_holes(st_ops->value_type, value);
+	err = check_zero_holes(st_ops->btf, st_ops->value_type, value);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	uvalue = value;
-	err = check_zero_holes(t, uvalue->data);
+	err = check_zero_holes(st_ops->btf, t, uvalue->data);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -773,8 +784,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
 	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
+	struct btf *btf;
 
-	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
+	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id, btf_vmlinux);
 	if (!st_ops)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bb78212fa5b2..c0cab601b2a6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19191,7 +19191,7 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	}
 
 	btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
-	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_id);
+	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_id, btf_vmlinux);
 	if (!st_ops) {
 		verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a supported struct\n",
 			btf_id);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13  6:14 [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-09-15 22:43   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-16  1:35     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: add register and unregister functions for struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-16  0:05   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-16  1:14     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-18 18:47       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-18 20:40         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-13  6:14 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: use attached BTF to find correct type info of struct_ops progs thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 6/9] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 7/9] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 9/9] Comments and debug thinker.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230913061449.1918219-4-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox