public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map.
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:14:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913061449.1918219-6-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913061449.1918219-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Ensure a module doesn't go away when a struct_ops map is still alive with a
struct_ops type defined by the module.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h         |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index a9369f982cd5..236a53330c85 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1615,6 +1615,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
 	int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
 	int (*validate)(void *kdata);
 	const struct btf *btf;
+	struct module *owner;
 	const struct btf_type *type;
 	const struct btf_type *value_type;
 	const char *name;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index c93baf54a538..845873bc806d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_static[] = {
 static struct bpf_struct_ops **bpf_struct_ops;
 static int bpf_struct_ops_num;
 static int bpf_struct_ops_capacity;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 
 const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_struct_ops_verifier_ops = {
 };
@@ -307,7 +308,10 @@ int register_bpf_struct_ops(struct bpf_struct_ops_mod *mod)
 	}
 
 	bpf_struct_ops_init_one(st_ops, btf, log);
+	st_ops->owner = mod->owner;
+	mutex_lock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 	err = add_struct_ops(st_ops);
+	mutex_unlock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 
 errout:
 	kfree(log);
@@ -321,7 +325,9 @@ int unregister_bpf_struct_ops(struct bpf_struct_ops_mod *mod)
 	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = mod->st_ops;
 	int err;
 
+	mutex_lock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 	err = remove_struct_ops(st_ops);
+	mutex_unlock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 	if (!err && st_ops->uninit)
 		err = st_ops->uninit();
 
@@ -334,34 +340,44 @@ extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
 static const struct bpf_struct_ops *
 bpf_struct_ops_find_value(u32 value_id, struct btf *btf)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = NULL;
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	if (!value_id || !btf_vmlinux)
 		return NULL;
 
+	mutex_lock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < bpf_struct_ops_num; i++) {
 		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->value_id == value_id &&
-		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf)
-			return bpf_struct_ops[i];
+		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf) {
+			st_ops = bpf_struct_ops[i];
+			break;
+		}
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 
-	return NULL;
+	return st_ops;
 }
 
 const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id, struct btf *btf)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = NULL;
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	if (!type_id || !btf_vmlinux)
 		return NULL;
 
+	mutex_lock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < bpf_struct_ops_num; i++) {
 		if (bpf_struct_ops[i]->type_id == type_id &&
-		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf)
-			return bpf_struct_ops[i];
+		    bpf_struct_ops[i]->btf == btf) {
+			st_ops = bpf_struct_ops[i];
+			break;
+		}
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&bpf_struct_ops_mutex);
 
-	return NULL;
+	return st_ops;
 }
 
 static int bpf_struct_ops_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
@@ -749,6 +765,8 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
+
 	/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
 	 *
 	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
@@ -766,6 +784,7 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 	 */
 	synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_tasks);
 
+	module_put(st_map->st_ops->owner);
 	__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
 }
 
@@ -799,6 +818,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!st_ops)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
 
+	if (!try_module_get(st_ops->owner))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
 	vt = st_ops->value_type;
 	if (attr->value_size != vt->size)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13  6:14 [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-09-15 22:43   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-16  1:35     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: add register and unregister functions for struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-16  0:05   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-16  1:14     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-18 18:47       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-18 20:40         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf: attach a module BTF to a bpf_struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: use attached BTF to find correct type info of struct_ops progs thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 6/9] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 7/9] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-09-13  6:14 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 9/9] Comments and debug thinker.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230913061449.1918219-6-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox