BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/3] Open-coded task_vma iter
@ 2023-10-02 19:53 Dave Marchevsky
  2023-10-02 19:53 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num Dave Marchevsky
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dave Marchevsky @ 2023-10-02 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Kernel Team, Dave Marchevsky

At Meta we have a profiling daemon which periodically collects
information on many hosts. This collection usually involves grabbing
stacks (user and kernel) using perf_event BPF progs and later symbolicating
them. For user stacks we try to use BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID and rely on
remote symbolication, but BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID doesn't always succeed. In
those cases we must fall back to digging around in /proc/PID/maps to map
virtual address to (binary, offset). The /proc/PID/maps digging does not
occur synchronously with stack collection, so the process might already
be gone, in which case it won't have /proc/PID/maps and we will fail to
symbolicate.

This 'exited process problem' doesn't occur very often as
most of the prod services we care to profile are long-lived daemons, but
there are enough usecases to warrant a workaround: a BPF program which
can be optionally loaded at data collection time and essentially walks
/proc/PID/maps. Currently this is done by walking the vma list:

  struct vm_area_struct* mmap = BPF_CORE_READ(mm, mmap);
  mmap_next = BPF_CORE_READ(rmap, vm_next); /* in a loop */

Since commit 763ecb035029 ("mm: remove the vma linked list") there's no
longer a vma linked list to walk. Walking the vma maple tree is not as
simple as hopping struct vm_area_struct->vm_next. Luckily,
commit f39af05949a4 ("mm: add VMA iterator"), another commit in that series,
added struct vma_iterator and for_each_vma macro for easy vma iteration. If
similar functionality was exposed to BPF programs, it would be perfect for our
usecase.

This series adds such functionality, specifically a BPF equivalent of
for_each_vma using the open-coded iterator style.

Notes:
  * This approach was chosen after discussion on a previous series [0] which
    attempted to solve the same problem by adding a BPF_F_VMA_NEXT flag to
    bpf_find_vma.
  * Unlike the task_vma bpf_iter, the open-coded iterator kfuncs here do not
    drop the vma read lock between iterations. See Alexei's response in [0].
  * The [vsyscall] page isn't really part of task->mm's vmas, but
    /proc/PID/maps returns information about it anyways. The vma iter added
    here does not do the same. See comment on selftest in patch 3.
  * bpf_iter_task_vma allocates a _data struct which contains - among other
    things - struct vma_iterator, using BPF allocator and keeps a pointer to
    the bpf_iter_task_vma_data. This is done in order to prevent changes to
    struct ma_state - which is wrapped by struct vma_iterator - from
    necessitating changes to uapi struct bpf_iter_task_vma.

Changelog:

v3 -> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230822050558.2937659-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/

Patch 1 ("bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num")
  * Add Andrii ack
Patch 2 ("bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs")
  * Mark bpf_iter_task_vma_new args KF_RCU and remove now-unnecessary !task
    check (Yonghong)
    * Although KF_RCU is a function-level flag, in reality it only applies to
      the task_struct *task parameter, as the other two params are a scalar int
      and a specially-handled KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ITER
   * Remove struct bpf_iter_task_vma definition from uapi headers, define in
     kernel/bpf/task_iter.c instead (Andrii)
Patch 3 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter")
  * Use a local var when looping over vmas to track map idx. Update vmas_seen
    global after done iterating. Don't start iterating or update vmas_seen if
    vmas_seen global is nonzero. (Andrii)
  * Move getpgid() call to correct spot - above skel detach. (Andrii)

v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230821173415.1970776-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/

Patch 1 ("bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num")
  * Add Yonghong ack

Patch 2 ("bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs")
  * UAPI bpf header and tools/ version should match
  * Add bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data which bpf_iter_task_vma_kern points to,
    bpf_mem_alloc/free it instead of just vma_iterator. (Alexei)
    * Inner data ptr == NULL implies initialization failed


v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230810183513.684836-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
  * Patch 1
    * Now removes the unnecessary BTF_TYPE_EMIT instead of changing the
      type (Yonghong)
  * Patch 2
    * Don't do unnecessary BTF_TYPE_EMIT (Yonghong)
    * Bump task refcount to prevent ->mm reuse (Yonghong)
    * Keep a pointer to vma_iterator in bpf_iter_task_vma, alloc/free
      via BPF mem allocator (Yonghong, Stanislav)
  * Patch 3

Patch summary:
  * Patch 1 is a tiny fix I ran into while implementing the vma iter in this
    series. It can be applied independently.
  * Patch 2 is the meat of the implementation
  * Patch 3 adds tests for the new functionality
    * Existing iter tests exercise failure cases (e.g. prog that doesn't call
      _destroy()). I didn't replicate them in this series, but am happy to add
      them in v2 if folks feel that it would be worthwhile.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230801145414.418145-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/

Dave Marchevsky (3):
  bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num
  bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter

 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c                         |  2 -
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  3 +
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c                        | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h                   |  8 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 26 +++---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c  | 71 ++++++++++++++++
 ...f_iter_task_vma.c => bpf_iter_task_vmas.c} |  0
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_vma.c      | 63 ++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{bpf_iter_task_vma.c => bpf_iter_task_vmas.c} (100%)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_vma.c

-- 
2.34.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-03 22:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-02 19:53 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/3] Open-coded task_vma iter Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-02 19:53 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-02 19:53 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-02 21:29   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-03 16:28   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-03 22:39   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-02 19:53 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-03 22:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox