From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/13] bpf: validate value_type
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:12:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231106201252.1568931-10-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231106201252.1568931-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
A value_type should consist of three components: refcnt, state, and data.
refcnt and state has been move to struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value to
make it easier to check the value type.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index c287f42b2e48..48e97a255945 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3231,4 +3231,18 @@ static inline bool bpf_is_subprog(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
return prog->aux->func_idx != 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
+enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY,
+};
+
+struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value {
+ refcount_t refcnt;
+ enum bpf_struct_ops_state state;
+};
+#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_JIT */
+
#endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index d1af0ebaf02f..2d853431bf09 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -13,19 +13,8 @@
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
-enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY,
-};
-
-#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE \
- refcount_t refcnt; \
- enum bpf_struct_ops_state state
-
struct bpf_struct_ops_value {
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE;
+ struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common;
char data[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
@@ -80,8 +69,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(update_mutex);
#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE(_name) \
extern struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_##_name; \
\
-struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name { \
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE; \
+struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name { \
+ struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common; \
struct _name data ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; \
};
#include "bpf_struct_ops_types.h"
@@ -112,11 +101,49 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_struct_ops_prog_ops = {
BTF_ID_LIST(st_ops_ids)
BTF_ID(struct, module)
+BTF_ID(struct, bpf_struct_ops_common_value)
enum {
IDX_MODULE_ID,
+ IDX_ST_OPS_COMMON_VALUE_ID,
};
+extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
+
+static bool is_valid_value_type(struct btf *btf, s32 value_id,
+ const struct btf_type *type,
+ const char *value_name)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *common_value_type;
+ const struct btf_member *member;
+ const struct btf_type *vt, *mt;
+
+ vt = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
+ if (btf_vlen(vt) != 2) {
+ pr_warn("The number of %s's members should be 2, but we get %d\n",
+ value_name, btf_vlen(vt));
+ return false;
+ }
+ member = btf_type_member(vt);
+ mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+ common_value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux,
+ st_ops_ids[IDX_ST_OPS_COMMON_VALUE_ID]);
+ if (mt != common_value_type) {
+ pr_warn("The first member of %s should be bpf_struct_ops_common_value\n",
+ value_name);
+ return false;
+ }
+ member++;
+ mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+ if (mt != type) {
+ pr_warn("The second member of %s should be %s\n",
+ value_name, btf_name_by_offset(btf, type->name_off));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
struct btf *btf,
struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
@@ -137,14 +164,6 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
}
sprintf(value_name, "%s%s", VALUE_PREFIX, st_ops->name);
- value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
- BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
- if (value_id < 0) {
- pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
- value_name);
- return;
- }
-
type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, st_ops->name,
BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
if (type_id < 0) {
@@ -159,6 +178,16 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
return;
}
+ value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
+ BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (value_id < 0) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
+ value_name);
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!is_valid_value_type(btf, value_id, t, value_name))
+ return;
+
for_each_member(i, t, member) {
const struct btf_type *func_proto;
@@ -218,8 +247,6 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
}
}
-extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
-
static const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *
bpf_struct_ops_find_value(struct btf *btf, u32 value_id)
{
@@ -275,7 +302,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
kvalue = &st_map->kvalue;
/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
- state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->state);
+ state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->common.state);
if (state == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
memset(value, 0, map->value_size);
return 0;
@@ -286,7 +313,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
*/
uvalue = value;
memcpy(uvalue, st_map->uvalue, map->value_size);
- uvalue->state = state;
+ uvalue->common.state = state;
/* This value offers the user space a general estimate of how
* many sockets are still utilizing this struct_ops for TCP
@@ -294,7 +321,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
* should sufficiently meet our present goals.
*/
refcnt = atomic64_read(&map->refcnt) - atomic64_read(&map->usercnt);
- refcount_set(&uvalue->refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
+ refcount_set(&uvalue->common.refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
return 0;
}
@@ -408,7 +435,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
if (err)
return err;
- if (uvalue->state || refcount_read(&uvalue->refcnt))
+ if (uvalue->common.state || refcount_read(&uvalue->common.refcnt))
return -EINVAL;
tlinks = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tlinks), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -420,7 +447,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
mutex_lock(&st_map->lock);
- if (kvalue->state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
+ if (kvalue->common.state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -542,7 +569,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
*
* Pair with smp_load_acquire() during lookup_elem().
*/
- smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
+ smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
goto unlock;
}
@@ -560,7 +587,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
* It ensures the above udata updates (e.g. prog->aux->id)
* can be seen once BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE is set.
*/
- smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
+ smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
/* Hold the owner module until the struct_ops is
* unregistered
*/
@@ -596,7 +623,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
if (st_map->map.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.state,
+ prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.common.state,
BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE);
switch (prev_state) {
@@ -847,7 +874,7 @@ static bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
return map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS &&
map->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK &&
/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
- smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
+ smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.common.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
}
static void bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 20:12 [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/13] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-21 23:53 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 02/13] bpf: get type information with BPF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 03/13] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 04/13] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:35 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 2:27 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/13] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 2:28 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 06/13] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 07/13] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:04 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 22:33 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-27 22:08 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 08/13] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-11-10 2:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/13] bpf: validate value_type Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 10/13] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:53 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 11/13] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 12/13] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 13/13] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:59 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-17 10:45 ` Hou Tao
2023-11-23 0:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-10 6:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231106201252.1568931-10-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox