From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>,
thinker.li@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
andrii@kernel.org, drosen@google.com
Cc: kuifeng@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 13/13] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops().
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:00:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fc820bb-48c3-4dd8-8aa2-8d206801ab62@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9360742-57db-9f40-6227-d15db29ee25f@huaweicloud.com>
On 11/17/23 02:45, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/7/2023 4:12 AM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>>
>> Create a new struct_ops type called bpf_testmod_ops within the bpf_testmod
>> module. When a struct_ops object is registered, the bpf_testmod module will
>> invoke test_2 from the module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
> SNIP
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..49f4a4460642
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include <time.h>
>> +
>> +#include "rcu_tasks_trace_gp.skel.h"
>
> It is no needed anymore. It seems it is a leftover from last revision.
>
You are right! I will clean it up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 20:12 [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/13] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-21 23:53 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 02/13] bpf: get type information with BPF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 03/13] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 04/13] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:35 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 2:27 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/13] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2023-11-10 1:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 2:28 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 06/13] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 07/13] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:04 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 22:33 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-27 22:08 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 08/13] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/13] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 10/13] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:53 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 11/13] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 12/13] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 13/13] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-11-10 2:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:59 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-17 10:45 ` Hou Tao
2023-11-23 0:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2023-11-10 6:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fc820bb-48c3-4dd8-8aa2-8d206801ab62@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox