From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: move verbose_linfo() into kernel/bpf/log.c
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:10:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231110161057.1943534-2-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110161057.1943534-1-andrii@kernel.org>
verifier.c is huge. Let's try to move out parts that are logging-related
into log.c, as we previously did with bpf_log() and other related stuff.
This patch moves line info verbose output routines: it's pretty
self-contained and isolated code, so there is no problem with this.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 4 +++
kernel/bpf/log.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 57 ----------------------------------
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 24213a99cc79..d7898f636929 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -679,6 +679,10 @@ int bpf_vlog_init(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, u32 log_level,
void bpf_vlog_reset(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, u64 new_pos);
int bpf_vlog_finalize(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, u32 *log_size_actual);
+__printf(3, 4) void verbose_linfo(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ u32 insn_off,
+ const char *prefix_fmt, ...);
+
static inline struct bpf_func_state *cur_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 850494423530..f20e1449c882 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
+#define verbose(env, fmt, args...) bpf_verifier_log_write(env, fmt, ##args)
+
static bool bpf_verifier_log_attr_valid(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
{
/* ubuf and len_total should both be specified (or not) together */
@@ -325,3 +327,60 @@ __printf(2, 3) void bpf_log(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
va_end(args);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_log);
+
+static const struct bpf_line_info *
+find_linfo(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_off)
+{
+ const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ u32 i, nr_linfo;
+
+ prog = env->prog;
+ nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
+
+ if (!nr_linfo || insn_off >= prog->len)
+ return NULL;
+
+ linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
+ for (i = 1; i < nr_linfo; i++)
+ if (insn_off < linfo[i].insn_off)
+ break;
+
+ return &linfo[i - 1];
+}
+
+static const char *ltrim(const char *s)
+{
+ while (isspace(*s))
+ s++;
+
+ return s;
+}
+
+__printf(3, 4) void verbose_linfo(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ u32 insn_off,
+ const char *prefix_fmt, ...)
+{
+ const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
+
+ if (!bpf_verifier_log_needed(&env->log))
+ return;
+
+ linfo = find_linfo(env, insn_off);
+ if (!linfo || linfo == env->prev_linfo)
+ return;
+
+ if (prefix_fmt) {
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, prefix_fmt);
+ bpf_verifier_vlog(&env->log, prefix_fmt, args);
+ va_end(args);
+ }
+
+ verbose(env, "%s\n",
+ ltrim(btf_name_by_offset(env->prog->aux->btf,
+ linfo->line_off)));
+
+ env->prev_linfo = linfo;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9ae6eae13471..d2830d384d9b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -337,27 +337,6 @@ struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock);
-static const struct bpf_line_info *
-find_linfo(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_off)
-{
- const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
- const struct bpf_prog *prog;
- u32 i, nr_linfo;
-
- prog = env->prog;
- nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
-
- if (!nr_linfo || insn_off >= prog->len)
- return NULL;
-
- linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
- for (i = 1; i < nr_linfo; i++)
- if (insn_off < linfo[i].insn_off)
- break;
-
- return &linfo[i - 1];
-}
-
__printf(2, 3) static void verbose(void *private_data, const char *fmt, ...)
{
struct bpf_verifier_env *env = private_data;
@@ -371,42 +350,6 @@ __printf(2, 3) static void verbose(void *private_data, const char *fmt, ...)
va_end(args);
}
-static const char *ltrim(const char *s)
-{
- while (isspace(*s))
- s++;
-
- return s;
-}
-
-__printf(3, 4) static void verbose_linfo(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- u32 insn_off,
- const char *prefix_fmt, ...)
-{
- const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
-
- if (!bpf_verifier_log_needed(&env->log))
- return;
-
- linfo = find_linfo(env, insn_off);
- if (!linfo || linfo == env->prev_linfo)
- return;
-
- if (prefix_fmt) {
- va_list args;
-
- va_start(args, prefix_fmt);
- bpf_verifier_vlog(&env->log, prefix_fmt, args);
- va_end(args);
- }
-
- verbose(env, "%s\n",
- ltrim(btf_name_by_offset(env->prog->aux->btf,
- linfo->line_off)));
-
- env->prev_linfo = linfo;
-}
-
static void verbose_invalid_scalar(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
struct tnum *range, const char *ctx,
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-10 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 16:10 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] BPF verifier log improvements Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: move verifier state printing code to kernel/bpf/log.c Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 17:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-11-10 17:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: extract register state printing Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: print spilled register state in stack slot Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: emit map name in register state if applicable and available Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] bpf: omit default off=0 and imm=0 in register state log Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] bpf: smarter verifier log number printing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:51 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-11-11 6:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] bpf: emit frameno for PTR_TO_STACK regs if it differs from current one Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 18:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] BPF verifier log improvements Stanislav Fomichev
2023-11-10 19:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231110161057.1943534-2-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox