From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] BPF verifier log improvements
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 10:50:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZU57YmTj7GDY3ogk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110161057.1943534-1-andrii@kernel.org>
On 11/10, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> This patch set moves a big chunk of verifier log related code from gigantic
> verifier.c file into more focused kernel/bpf/log.c. This is not essential to
> the rest of functionality in this patch set, so I can undo it, but it felt
> like it's good to start chipping away from 20K+ verifier.c whenever we can.
>
> The main purpose of the patch set, though, is in improving verifier log
> further.
>
> Patches #3-#4 start printing out register state even if that register is
> spilled into stack slot. Previously we'd get only spilled register type, but
> no additional information, like SCALAR_VALUE's ranges. Super limiting during
> debugging. For cases of register spills smaller than 8 bytes, we also print
> out STACK_MISC/STACK_ZERO/STACK_INVALID markers. This, among other things,
> will make it easier to write tests for these mixed spill/misc cases.
>
> Patch #5 prints map name for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE/PTR_TO_MAP_KEY/CONST_PTR_TO_MAP
> registers. In big production BPF programs, it's important to map assembly to
> actual map, and it's often non-trivial. Having map name helps.
[..]
> Patch #6 just removes visual noise in form of ubiquitous imm=0 and off=0. They
> are default values, omit them.
If you end up with another respin for some reason:
s/verifierl/verifier/
s/furthre/futher/
(in the commit description)
> Patch #7 is probably the most controversial, but it reworks how verifier log
> prints numbers. For small valued integers we use decimals, but for large ones
> we switch to hexadecimal. From personal experience this is a much more useful
> convention. We can tune what consitutes "small value", for now it's 16-bit
> range.
Not sure why not always print in hex, but no strong preference here.
> Patch #8 prints frame number for PTR_TO_CTX registers, if that frame is
> different from the "current" one. This removes ambiguity and confusion,
> especially in complicated cases with multiple subprogs passing around
> pointers.
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (8):
> bpf: move verbose_linfo() into kernel/bpf/log.c
> bpf: move verifier state printing code to kernel/bpf/log.c
> bpf: extract register state printing
> bpf: print spilled register state in stack slot
> bpf: emit map name in register state if applicable and available
> bpf: omit default off=0 and imm=0 in register state log
> bpf: smarter verifier log number printing logic
> bpf: emit frameno for PTR_TO_STACK regs if it differs from current one
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-10 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 16:10 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] BPF verifier log improvements Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: move verbose_linfo() into kernel/bpf/log.c Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: move verifier state printing code to kernel/bpf/log.c Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 17:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-11-10 17:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: extract register state printing Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: print spilled register state in stack slot Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: emit map name in register state if applicable and available Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] bpf: omit default off=0 and imm=0 in register state log Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] bpf: smarter verifier log number printing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:51 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-11-11 6:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] bpf: emit frameno for PTR_TO_STACK regs if it differs from current one Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-10 18:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-11-10 19:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] BPF verifier log improvements Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-11 0:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZU57YmTj7GDY3ogk@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox