BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:08:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213190842.3844987-11-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231213190842.3844987-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Add new subtest validating LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar semantics.
Extend existing test to validate that LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH allows to
disable implicit BPF token creation by setting envvar to empty string.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c  | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
index 1a3c3aacf537..548aeb91ab0d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
@@ -769,6 +769,9 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_btf_success(int mnt_fd)
 	return validate_struct_ops_load(mnt_fd, true /* should succeed */);
 }
 
+#define TOKEN_ENVVAR "LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH"
+#define TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM "/bpf-token-fs"
+
 static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
@@ -791,6 +794,20 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "move_mount_bpffs"))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* disable implicit BPF token creation by setting
+	 * LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar to empty value, load should fail
+	 */
+	err = setenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR, "", 1 /*overwrite*/);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setenv_token_path"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_token_envvar_disabled_load")) {
+		unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+
 	/* now the same struct_ops skeleton should succeed thanks to libppf
 	 * creating BPF token from /sys/fs/bpf mount point
 	 */
@@ -826,6 +843,90 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar(int mnt_fd)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	/* before we mount BPF FS with token delegation, struct_ops skeleton
+	 * should fail to load
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_tokenless_load")) {
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* mount custom BPF FS over custom location, so libbpf can't create
+	 * BPF token implicitly, unless pointed to it through
+	 * LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar
+	 */
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(mkdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, 0777), "mkdir_bpffs_custom"))
+		goto err_out;
+	err = sys_move_mount(mnt_fd, "", AT_FDCWD, TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, MOVE_MOUNT_F_EMPTY_PATH);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "move_mount_bpffs"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* even though we have BPF FS with delegation, it's not at default
+	 * /sys/fs/bpf location, so we still fail to load until envvar is set up
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_tokenless_load2")) {
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	err = setenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR, TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, 1 /*overwrite*/);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setenv_token_path"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* now the same struct_ops skeleton should succeed thanks to libppf
+	 * creating BPF token from custom mount point
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_implicit_token_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+
+	/* now disable implicit token through empty bpf_token_path, envvar
+	 * will be ignored, should fail
+	 */
+	opts.bpf_token_path = "";
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_empty_token_path_open"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	err = dummy_st_ops_success__load(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "obj_empty_token_path_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* now disable implicit token through negative bpf_token_fd, envvar
+	 * will be ignored, should fail
+	 */
+	opts.bpf_token_path = NULL;
+	opts.bpf_token_fd = -1;
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_neg_token_fd_open"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	err = dummy_st_ops_success__load(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "obj_neg_token_fd_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+	return 0;
+err_out:
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 #define bit(n) (1ULL << (n))
 
 void test_token(void)
@@ -904,4 +1005,15 @@ void test_token(void)
 
 		subtest_userns(&opts, userns_obj_priv_implicit_token);
 	}
+	if (test__start_subtest("obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar")) {
+		struct bpffs_opts opts = {
+			/* allow BTF loading */
+			.cmds = bit(BPF_BTF_LOAD) | bit(BPF_MAP_CREATE) | bit(BPF_PROG_LOAD),
+			.maps = bit(BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
+			.progs = bit(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
+			.attachs = ~0ULL,
+		};
+
+		subtest_userns(&opts, userns_obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar);
+	}
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-13 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-13 19:08 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: fail BPF_TOKEN_CREATE if no delegation option was set on BPF FS Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/10] libbpf: split feature detectors definitions from cached results Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] libbpf: further decouple feature checking logic from bpf_object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/10] libbpf: move feature detection code into its own file Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/10] libbpf: wire up token_fd into feature probing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/10] libbpf: wire up BPF token support at BPF object level Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: add BPF object loading tests with explicit token passing Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for BPF object load with implicit token Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/10] libbpf: support BPF token path setting through LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-12-14  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-12-14  0:45 ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231213190842.3844987-11-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox