From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: fail BPF_TOKEN_CREATE if no delegation option was set on BPF FS
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:08:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213190842.3844987-2-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231213190842.3844987-1-andrii@kernel.org>
It's quite confusing in practice when it's possible to successfully
create a BPF token from BPF FS that didn't have any of delegate_xxx
mount options set up. While it's not wrong, it's actually more
meaningful to reject BPF_TOKEN_CREATE with specific error code (-ENOENT)
to let user-space know that no token delegation is setup up.
So, instead of creating empty BPF token that will be always ignored
because it doesn't have any of the allow_xxx bits set, reject it with
-ENOENT. If we ever need empty BPF token to be possible, we can support
that with extra flag passed into BPF_TOKEN_CREATE.
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/token.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/token.c b/kernel/bpf/token.c
index 17212efcde60..a86fccd57e2d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/token.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/token.c
@@ -152,6 +152,15 @@ int bpf_token_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
goto out_path;
}
+ mnt_opts = path.dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
+ if (mnt_opts->delegate_cmds == 0 &&
+ mnt_opts->delegate_maps == 0 &&
+ mnt_opts->delegate_progs == 0 &&
+ mnt_opts->delegate_attachs == 0) {
+ err = -ENOENT; /* no BPF token delegation is set up */
+ goto out_path;
+ }
+
mode = S_IFREG | ((S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR) & ~current_umask());
inode = bpf_get_inode(path.mnt->mnt_sb, NULL, mode);
if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
@@ -181,7 +190,6 @@ int bpf_token_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
/* remember bpffs owning userns for future ns_capable() checks */
token->userns = get_user_ns(userns);
- mnt_opts = path.dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
token->allowed_cmds = mnt_opts->delegate_cmds;
token->allowed_maps = mnt_opts->delegate_maps;
token->allowed_progs = mnt_opts->delegate_progs;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 19:08 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/10] libbpf: split feature detectors definitions from cached results Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] libbpf: further decouple feature checking logic from bpf_object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/10] libbpf: move feature detection code into its own file Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/10] libbpf: wire up token_fd into feature probing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/10] libbpf: wire up BPF token support at BPF object level Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: add BPF object loading tests with explicit token passing Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for BPF object load with implicit token Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/10] libbpf: support BPF token path setting through LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for " Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-12-14 0:45 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231213190842.3844987-2-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox