BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v17 09/14] bpf: hold module refcnt in bpf_struct_ops map creation and prog verification.
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:50:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240119225005.668602-10-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119225005.668602-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

To ensure that a module remains accessible whenever a struct_ops object of
a struct_ops type provided by the module is still in use.

struct bpf_struct_ops_map doesn't hold a refcnt to btf anymore since a
module will hold a refcnt to it's btf already. But, struct_ops programs are
different. They hold their associated btf, not the module since they need
only btf to assure their types (signatures).

However, verifier holds the refcnt of the associated module of a struct_ops
type temporarily when verify a struct_ops prog. Verifier needs the help
from the verifier operators (struct bpf_verifier_ops) provided by the owner
module to verify data access of a prog, provide information, and generate
code.

This patch also add a count of links (links_cnt) to bpf_struct_ops_map. It
avoids bpf_struct_ops_map_put_progs() from accessing btf after calling
module_put() in bpf_struct_ops_map_free().

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |  1 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c  | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 11 +++++++++++
 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 51121dbf8e98..91714edd6193 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1674,6 +1674,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
 	int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
 	int (*validate)(void *kdata);
 	void *cfi_stubs;
+	struct module *owner;
 	const char *name;
 	struct btf_func_model func_models[BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS];
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index d07d857ca67f..e6cf025c9446 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
 	u32 prev_insn_idx;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;		/* eBPF program being verified */
 	const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops;
+	struct module *attach_btf_mod;	/* The owner module of prog->aux->attach_btf */
 	struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
 	int stack_size;			/* number of states to be processed */
 	bool strict_alignment;		/* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 3b8d689ece5d..02216a8d9265 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_map {
 	 * (in kvalue.data).
 	 */
 	struct bpf_link **links;
+	u32 links_cnt;
 	/* image is a page that has all the trampolines
 	 * that stores the func args before calling the bpf_prog.
 	 * A PAGE_SIZE "image" is enough to store all trampoline for
@@ -306,10 +307,9 @@ static void *bpf_struct_ops_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_put_progs(struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map)
 {
-	const struct btf_type *t = st_map->st_ops_desc->type;
 	u32 i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < btf_type_vlen(t); i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < st_map->links_cnt; i++) {
 		if (st_map->links[i]) {
 			bpf_link_put(st_map->links[i]);
 			st_map->links[i] = NULL;
@@ -641,12 +641,20 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 		bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE);
 	}
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue);
-	btf_put(st_map->btf);
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
 }
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
+
+	/* st_ops->owner was acquired during map_alloc to implicitly holds
+	 * the btf's refcnt. The acquire was only done when btf_is_module()
+	 * st_map->btf cannot be NULL here.
+	 */
+	if (btf_is_module(st_map->btf))
+		module_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->owner);
+
 	/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
 	 *
 	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
@@ -682,6 +690,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	size_t st_map_size;
 	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
 	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
+	struct module *mod = NULL;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret;
@@ -695,11 +704,18 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 			btf_put(btf);
 			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 		}
+
+		mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+		/* mod holds a refcnt to btf. We don't need an extra refcnt
+		 * here.
+		 */
+		btf_put(btf);
+		if (!mod)
+			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	} else {
 		btf = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
 		if (IS_ERR(btf))
 			return ERR_CAST(btf);
-		btf_get(btf);
 	}
 
 	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
@@ -746,8 +762,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		goto errout_free;
 	}
 	st_map->uvalue = bpf_map_area_alloc(vt->size, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	st_map->links_cnt = btf_type_vlen(t);
 	st_map->links =
-		bpf_map_area_alloc(btf_type_vlen(t) * sizeof(struct bpf_links *),
+		bpf_map_area_alloc(st_map->links_cnt * sizeof(struct bpf_links *),
 				   NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	if (!st_map->uvalue || !st_map->links) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -763,7 +780,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 errout_free:
 	__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
 errout:
-	btf_put(btf);
+	module_put(mod);
 
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ff41f7736618..0fc998f3ce86 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20243,6 +20243,15 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	}
 
 	btf = prog->aux->attach_btf ?: bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
+	if (btf_is_module(btf)) {
+		/* Make sure st_ops is valid through the lifetime of env */
+		env->attach_btf_mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+		if (!env->attach_btf_mod) {
+			verbose(env, "struct_ops module %s is not found\n",
+				btf_get_name(btf));
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
 
 	btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf, btf_id);
@@ -20968,6 +20977,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
 		env->prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
 
 	*prog = env->prog;
+
+	module_put(env->attach_btf_mod);
 err_unlock:
 	if (!is_priv)
 		mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-19 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-19 22:49 [PATCH bpf-next v17 00/14] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 01/14] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 02/14] bpf: get type information with BTF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 03/14] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 04/14] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 05/14] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 06/14] bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 07/14] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 08/14] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` thinker.li [this message]
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 10/14] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 11/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2024-01-23  7:11   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 12/14] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 13/14] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 14/14] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240119225005.668602-10-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox