BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:02:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Dave Thaler wrote:
> As discussed in mailing list discussion at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/
> this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions"
> section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which
> were never defined and so are not deprecated).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index af43227b6..cf08337bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -635,7 +635,9 @@ Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
>  -------------------------------------
>  
>  BPF previously introduced special instructions for access to packet data that were
> -carried over from classic BPF. However, these instructions are
> +carried over from classic BPF. These instructions used an instruction
> +class of BPF_LD, a size modifier of BPF_W, BPF_H, or BPF_B, and a
> +mode modifier of BPF_ABS or BPF_IND.  However, these instructions are
>  deprecated and should no longer be used.  All legacy packet access
>  instructions belong to the "legacy" conformance group instead of the "basic"
>  conformance group.
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:02:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240131190205.PkwI7htGx9Skf_BUUvZpb1mfxpdsjUkPewt-YtoVFc4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Dave Thaler wrote:
> As discussed in mailing list discussion at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/
> this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions"
> section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which
> were never defined and so are not deprecated).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index af43227b6..cf08337bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -635,7 +635,9 @@ Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
>  -------------------------------------
>  
>  BPF previously introduced special instructions for access to packet data that were
> -carried over from classic BPF. However, these instructions are
> +carried over from classic BPF. These instructions used an instruction
> +class of BPF_LD, a size modifier of BPF_W, BPF_H, or BPF_B, and a
> +mode modifier of BPF_ABS or BPF_IND.  However, these instructions are
>  deprecated and should no longer be used.  All legacy packet access
>  instructions belong to the "legacy" conformance group instead of the "basic"
>  conformance group.
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 76 bytes --]

-- 
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31  3:37 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed Dave Thaler
2024-01-31  3:37 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2024-01-31 18:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-31 18:44   ` [Bpf] " Yonghong Song
2024-01-31 19:02 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-01-31 19:02   ` David Vernet
2024-02-01 10:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=bpf@ietf.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dthaler1968@gmail.com \
    --cc=dthaler1968@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox