* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: handle CONFIG_SMP=n configuration in x86 BPF JIT
@ 2024-04-04 3:47 Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-04 4:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-04-04 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, kernel test robot
On non-SMP systems, there is no "per-CPU" data, it's just global data.
So in such case just don't do this_cpu_off-based per-CPU address adjustment.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404040951.d4CUx5S6-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index af89dd117dce..964e8154da66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1383,15 +1383,14 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
EMIT3(0x0F, 0x44, add_2reg(0xC0, AUX_REG, dst_reg));
break;
} else if (insn_is_mov_percpu_addr(insn)) {
- u32 off = (u32)(unsigned long)&this_cpu_off;
-
/* mov <dst>, <src> (if necessary) */
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, src_reg);
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* add <dst>, gs:[<off>] */
EMIT2(0x65, add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
EMIT3(0x03, add_1reg(0x04, dst_reg), 0x25);
- EMIT(off, 4);
+ EMIT((u32)(unsigned long)&this_cpu_off, 4);
+#endif
break;
}
fallthrough;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: handle CONFIG_SMP=n configuration in x86 BPF JIT
2024-04-04 3:47 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: handle CONFIG_SMP=n configuration in x86 BPF JIT Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-04-04 4:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-04-04 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau, kernel-team, lkp
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:47:26 -0700 you wrote:
> On non-SMP systems, there is no "per-CPU" data, it's just global data.
> So in such case just don't do this_cpu_off-based per-CPU address adjustment.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404040951.d4CUx5S6-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs")
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: handle CONFIG_SMP=n configuration in x86 BPF JIT
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1e9e0b85255e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-04 4:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-04 3:47 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: handle CONFIG_SMP=n configuration in x86 BPF JIT Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-04 4:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox