From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] bpf: initialize/free array of btf_field(s).
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:41:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410004150.2917641-6-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410004150.2917641-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Initialize and free each element in a btf_field array based on the values
of nelems and size in btf_field. The value of nelems is the length of the
flatten array for nested arrays.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f397ccdc6d4b..ee53dcd14bd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -390,6 +390,9 @@ static inline u32 btf_field_type_align(enum btf_field_type type)
static inline void bpf_obj_init_field(const struct btf_field *field, void *addr)
{
+ u32 elem_size;
+ int i;
+
memset(addr, 0, field->size);
switch (field->type) {
@@ -400,6 +403,10 @@ static inline void bpf_obj_init_field(const struct btf_field *field, void *addr)
RB_CLEAR_NODE((struct rb_node *)addr);
break;
case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
+ elem_size = field->size / field->nelems;
+ for (i = 0; i < field->nelems; i++, addr += elem_size)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD((struct list_head *)addr);
+ break;
case BPF_LIST_NODE:
INIT_LIST_HEAD((struct list_head *)addr);
break;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index e44c276e8617..543ff0d944e8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -672,6 +672,8 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj)
const struct btf_field *field = &fields[i];
void *field_ptr = obj + field->offset;
void *xchgd_field;
+ u32 elem_size = field->size / field->nelems;
+ int j;
switch (fields[i].type) {
case BPF_SPIN_LOCK:
@@ -680,35 +682,42 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj)
bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(field_ptr);
break;
case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
- WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)field_ptr, 0);
+ for (j = 0; j < field->nelems; j++, field_ptr += elem_size)
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)field_ptr, 0);
break;
case BPF_KPTR_REF:
case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
- xchgd_field = (void *)xchg((unsigned long *)field_ptr, 0);
- if (!xchgd_field)
- break;
-
- if (!btf_is_kernel(field->kptr.btf)) {
+ if (!btf_is_kernel(field->kptr.btf))
pointee_struct_meta = btf_find_struct_meta(field->kptr.btf,
field->kptr.btf_id);
- migrate_disable();
- __bpf_obj_drop_impl(xchgd_field, pointee_struct_meta ?
- pointee_struct_meta->record : NULL,
- fields[i].type == BPF_KPTR_PERCPU);
- migrate_enable();
- } else {
- field->kptr.dtor(xchgd_field);
+
+ for (j = 0; j < field->nelems; j++, field_ptr += elem_size) {
+ xchgd_field = (void *)xchg((unsigned long *)field_ptr, 0);
+ if (!xchgd_field)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!btf_is_kernel(field->kptr.btf)) {
+ migrate_disable();
+ __bpf_obj_drop_impl(xchgd_field, pointee_struct_meta ?
+ pointee_struct_meta->record : NULL,
+ fields[i].type == BPF_KPTR_PERCPU);
+ migrate_enable();
+ } else {
+ field->kptr.dtor(xchgd_field);
+ }
}
break;
case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rec->spin_lock_off < 0))
continue;
- bpf_list_head_free(field, field_ptr, obj + rec->spin_lock_off);
+ for (j = 0; j < field->nelems; j++, field_ptr += elem_size)
+ bpf_list_head_free(field, field_ptr, obj + rec->spin_lock_off);
break;
case BPF_RB_ROOT:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rec->spin_lock_off < 0))
continue;
- bpf_rb_root_free(field, field_ptr, obj + rec->spin_lock_off);
+ for (j = 0; j < field->nelems; j++, field_ptr += elem_size)
+ bpf_rb_root_free(field, field_ptr, obj + rec->spin_lock_off);
break;
case BPF_LIST_NODE:
case BPF_RB_NODE:
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 0:41 [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/11] bpf: Add nelems to struct btf_field_info and btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/11] bpf: check_map_kptr_access() compute the offset from the reg state Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 4:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-04-11 22:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] bpf: initialize/free array of btf_field(s) Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 3:56 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 15:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 17:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/11] bpf: Find btf_field with the knowledge of arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 2:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/11] bpf: check_map_access() " Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 16:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 19:29 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/11] bpf: Enable and verify btf_field arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/11] selftests/bpf: Test global kptr arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410004150.2917641-6-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox