From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 04/11] bpf: check_map_kptr_access() compute the offset from the reg state.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 01:13:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51436d219e351558fdb6b57641280039540754ee.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410004150.2917641-5-thinker.li@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 17:41 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> Previously, check_map_kptr_access() assumed that the accessed offset was
> identical to the offset in the btf_field. However, once field array is
> supported, the accessed offset no longer matches the offset in the
> bpf_field. It may refer to an element in an array while the offset in the
> bpf_field refers to the beginning of the array.
>
> To handle arrays, it computes the offset from the reg state instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 86adacc5f76c..34e43220c6f0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -5349,18 +5349,19 @@ static u32 btf_ld_kptr_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct btf_field *kptr
> }
>
> static int check_map_kptr_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
> - int value_regno, int insn_idx,
> + u32 offset, int value_regno, int insn_idx,
> struct btf_field *kptr_field)
> {
> struct bpf_insn *insn = &env->prog->insnsi[insn_idx];
> int class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
> - struct bpf_reg_state *val_reg;
> + struct bpf_reg_state *val_reg, *reg;
>
> /* Things we already checked for in check_map_access and caller:
Nit: at the moment when this patch is applied check_map_access is not
yet modified.
> * - Reject cases where variable offset may touch kptr
> * - size of access (must be BPF_DW)
> * - tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)
> - * - kptr_field->offset == off + reg->var_off.value
> + * - kptr_field->offset + kptr_field->size * i / kptr_field->nelems
> + * == off + reg->var_off.value where n is an index into the array
^^^ nit: this should be 'i'
> */
> /* Only BPF_[LDX,STX,ST] | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW is supported */
> if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) {
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 0:41 [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/11] bpf: Add nelems to struct btf_field_info and btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/11] bpf: check_map_kptr_access() compute the offset from the reg state Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-04-12 4:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] bpf: initialize/free array of btf_field(s) Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 3:56 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 15:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 17:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/11] bpf: Find btf_field with the knowledge of arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 2:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/11] bpf: check_map_access() " Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 16:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 19:29 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/11] bpf: Enable and verify btf_field arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/11] selftests/bpf: Test global kptr arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51436d219e351558fdb6b57641280039540754ee.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox