From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org,
Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>,
Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix formatting nit in instruction-set.rst
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:38:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240421163842.GA8626@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419213826.7301-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:38:26PM -0700, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Other places that had pseudocode were prefixed with ::
> so as to appear in a literal block, but one place was inconsistent.
> This patch fixes that inconsistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index 8d0781f0b..02fbc286c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ Note that there are varying definitions of the signed modulo operation
> when the dividend or divisor are negative, where implementations often
> vary by language such that Python, Ruby, etc. differ from C, Go, Java,
> etc. This specification requires that signed modulo use truncated division
> -(where -13 % 3 == -1) as implemented in C, Go, etc.:
> +(where -13 % 3 == -1) as implemented in C, Go, etc.::
>
> a % n = a - n * trunc(a / n)
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>
> --
> Bpf mailing list
> Bpf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org,
Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>,
Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix formatting nit in instruction-set.rst
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:38:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240421163842.GA8626@maniforge> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240421163842.DTgz1OciYZxaDofBU_5b0FdeB8bZZVrHlwmQTRfpE7E@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419213826.7301-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:38:26PM -0700, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Other places that had pseudocode were prefixed with ::
> so as to appear in a literal block, but one place was inconsistent.
> This patch fixes that inconsistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index 8d0781f0b..02fbc286c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ Note that there are varying definitions of the signed modulo operation
> when the dividend or divisor are negative, where implementations often
> vary by language such that Python, Ruby, etc. differ from C, Go, Java,
> etc. This specification requires that signed modulo use truncated division
> -(where -13 % 3 == -1) as implemented in C, Go, etc.:
> +(where -13 % 3 == -1) as implemented in C, Go, etc.::
>
> a % n = a - n * trunc(a / n)
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>
> --
> Bpf mailing list
> Bpf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 76 bytes --]
--
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-21 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 21:38 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix formatting nit in instruction-set.rst Dave Thaler
2024-04-19 21:38 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2024-04-21 16:38 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-04-21 16:38 ` David Vernet
2024-04-21 17:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240421163842.GA8626@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org \
--cc=dthaler1968@gmail.com \
--cc=dthaler1968@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox