From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@meta.com, Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubs
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 23:22:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240720062233.2319723-2-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240720062233.2319723-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The bpf_tcp_ca struct_ops currently uses a "u32 unsupported_ops[]"
array to track which ops is not supported.
After cfi_stubs had been added, the function pointer in cfi_stubs is
also NULL for the unsupported ops. Thus, the "u32 unsupported_ops[]"
becomes redundant. This observation was originally brought up in the
bpf/cfi discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJoEkdjyCEJRPASjBw1QGsKYrF33QdMGc1RZa9b88bAEA@mail.gmail.com/
The recent bpf qdisc patch (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240714175130.4051012-6-amery.hung@bytedance.com/)
also needs to specify quite many unsupported ops. It is a good time
to clean it up.
This patch removes the need of "u32 unsupported_ops[]" and tests for null-ness
in the cfi_stubs instead.
Testing the cfi_stubs is done in a new function bpf_struct_ops_supported().
The verifier will call bpf_struct_ops_supported() when loading the
struct_ops program. The ".check_member" is removed from the bpf_tcp_ca
in this patch. ".check_member" could still be useful for other subsytems
to enforce other restrictions (e.g. sched_ext checks for prog->sleepable).
To keep the same error return, ENOTSUPP is used.
Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++++++-
net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 26 --------------------------
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 4f1d4a97b9d1..6464dd78ea13 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1795,6 +1795,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value {
#define BPF_MODULE_OWNER ((void *)((0xeB9FUL << 2) + POISON_POINTER_DELTA))
bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata);
void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata);
+int bpf_struct_ops_supported(const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops, u32 moff);
int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
void *value);
int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
@@ -1851,6 +1852,10 @@ static inline void bpf_module_put(const void *data, struct module *owner)
{
module_put(owner);
}
+static inline int bpf_struct_ops_supported(const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops, u32 moff)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
static inline int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
void *key,
void *value)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index bb3eabc0dc76..93ade7072976 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -1040,6 +1040,13 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata)
bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
}
+int bpf_struct_ops_supported(const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops, u32 moff)
+{
+ void *func_ptr = *(void **)(&st_ops->cfi_stubs[moff]);
+
+ return func_ptr ? 0 : -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
static bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
{
struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 656766dd76df..33cb57c20d78 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -21132,6 +21132,7 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
u32 btf_id, member_idx;
struct btf *btf;
const char *mname;
+ int err;
if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
verbose(env, "struct ops programs must have a GPL compatible license\n");
@@ -21179,8 +21180,15 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ err = bpf_struct_ops_supported(st_ops, __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8);
+ if (err) {
+ verbose(env, "attach to unsupported member %s of struct %s\n",
+ mname, st_ops->name);
+ return err;
+ }
+
if (st_ops->check_member) {
- int err = st_ops->check_member(t, member, prog);
+ err = st_ops->check_member(t, member, prog);
if (err) {
verbose(env, "attach to unsupported member %s of struct %s\n",
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 3f88d0961e5b..554804774628 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -14,10 +14,6 @@
/* "extern" is to avoid sparse warning. It is only used in bpf_struct_ops.c. */
static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_congestion_ops;
-static u32 unsupported_ops[] = {
- offsetof(struct tcp_congestion_ops, get_info),
-};
-
static const struct btf_type *tcp_sock_type;
static u32 tcp_sock_id, sock_id;
static const struct btf_type *tcp_congestion_ops_type;
@@ -45,18 +41,6 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_init(struct btf *btf)
return 0;
}
-static bool is_unsupported(u32 member_offset)
-{
- unsigned int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unsupported_ops); i++) {
- if (member_offset == unsupported_ops[i])
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
static bool bpf_tcp_ca_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
const struct bpf_prog *prog,
@@ -251,15 +235,6 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
return 0;
}
-static int bpf_tcp_ca_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
- const struct btf_member *member,
- const struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- if (is_unsupported(__btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8))
- return -ENOTSUPP;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int bpf_tcp_ca_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
return tcp_register_congestion_control(kdata);
@@ -354,7 +329,6 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_congestion_ops = {
.reg = bpf_tcp_ca_reg,
.unreg = bpf_tcp_ca_unreg,
.update = bpf_tcp_ca_update,
- .check_member = bpf_tcp_ca_check_member,
.init_member = bpf_tcp_ca_init_member,
.init = bpf_tcp_ca_init,
.validate = bpf_tcp_ca_validate,
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-20 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-20 6:22 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Retire the unsupported_ops usage in struct_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20 6:22 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-07-20 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubs kernel test robot
2024-07-21 22:45 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-22 17:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20 6:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix the missing tramp_1 to tramp_40 ops in cfi_stubs Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20 6:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Ensure the unsupported struct_ops prog cannot be loaded Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Retire the unsupported_ops usage in struct_ops bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240720062233.2319723-2-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox