public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Ensure the unsupported struct_ops prog cannot be loaded
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 23:22:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240720062233.2319723-4-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240720062233.2319723-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

There is an existing "bpf_tcp_ca/unsupp_cong_op" test to ensure
the unsupported tcp-cc "get_info" struct_ops prog cannot be loaded.

This patch adds a new test in the bpf_testmod such that the
unsupported ops test does not depend on other kernel subsystem
where its supporting ops may be changed in the future.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  1 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c   |  2 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/unsupported_ops.c     | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/unsupported_ops.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index 23fa1872ee67..fe0d402b0d65 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops {
 	void (*test_2)(int a, int b);
 	/* Used to test nullable arguments. */
 	int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
+	int (*unsupported_ops)(void);
 
 	/* The following fields are used to test shadow copies. */
 	char onebyte;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
index bbcf12696a6b..75a0dea511b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include "struct_ops_nulled_out_cb.skel.h"
 #include "struct_ops_forgotten_cb.skel.h"
 #include "struct_ops_detach.skel.h"
+#include "unsupported_ops.skel.h"
 
 static void check_map_info(struct bpf_map_info *info)
 {
@@ -311,5 +312,6 @@ void serial_test_struct_ops_module(void)
 		test_struct_ops_forgotten_cb();
 	if (test__start_subtest("test_detach_link"))
 		test_detach_link();
+	RUN_TESTS(unsupported_ops);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/unsupported_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/unsupported_ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9180365a3568
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/unsupported_ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("struct_ops/unsupported_ops")
+__failure
+__msg("attach to unsupported member unsupported_ops of struct bpf_testmod_ops")
+int BPF_PROG(unsupported_ops)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod = {
+	.unsupported_ops = (void *)unsupported_ops,
+};
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-20  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-20  6:22 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Retire the unsupported_ops usage in struct_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20  6:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubs Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20 14:45   ` kernel test robot
2024-07-21 22:45     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-22 17:34       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20  6:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix the missing tramp_1 to tramp_40 ops in cfi_stubs Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-20  6:22 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-07-20  6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Retire the unsupported_ops usage in struct_ops bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240720062233.2319723-4-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox