From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/test: test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:49:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240813184943.3759630-4-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813184943.3759630-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This test adds a new struct_ops "bpf_testmod_st_ops" in bpf_testmod.
The ops of the bpf_testmod_st_ops is triggered by new kfunc calls
"bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_*logue". These new kfunc calls are
primarily used by the SEC("syscall") program. The test triggering
sequence is like:
SEC("syscall")
syscall_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
bpf_kfunc_st_op_test_prologue(args)
st_ops->test_prologue(args)
The .gen_prologue and .gen_epilogue of the bpf_testmod_st_ops
will add PROLOGUE_A (1000) and EPILOGUE_A (10000) to args->a.
.gen_prologue adds PROLOGUE_A (1000).
.gen_epilogue adds EPILOGUE_A (10000).
.gen_epilogue will also set the r0 to 2 * args->a.
The .gen_prologue and .gen_epilogue of the bpf_testmod_st_ops
will test the prog->aux->attach_func_name to decide if
it needs to generate codes.
The main programs of the SEC("struct_ops/..") will either
call a global subprog() which does "args->a += 1" or
call another new kfunc bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10 which does "args->a += 10".
The prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c will test_run the SEC("syscall")
programs. It checks the result by testing the args->a and the retval.
For example, when triggering the ops in the
'SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue") int BPF_PROG(test_epilogue_subprog..'
the expected args->a is
+1 (because of the subprog calls) + 10000 (.gen_epilogue) = 10001
The expected return value is 2 * 10001 (.gen_epilogue).
Another set of tests is to have the main struct_ops program
to call a subprog and call the inc10 kfunc.
There is also a bpf_tail_call test for epilogue.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 11 +
.../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 6 +
.../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c | 91 +++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_syscall.c | 113 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 411 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_syscall.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 3687a40b61c6..7194330bdefc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/in6.h>
#include <linux/un.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include "bpf_testmod.h"
@@ -920,6 +921,51 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getpeername(struct addr_args *args)
return err;
}
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(st_ops_mutex);
+static struct bpf_testmod_st_ops *st_ops;
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ mutex_lock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ if (st_ops && st_ops->test_prologue)
+ ret = st_ops->test_prologue(args);
+ mutex_unlock(&st_ops_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ mutex_lock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ if (st_ops && st_ops->test_epilogue)
+ ret = st_ops->test_epilogue(args);
+ mutex_unlock(&st_ops_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ mutex_lock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ if (st_ops && st_ops->test_pro_epilogue)
+ ret = st_ops->test_pro_epilogue(args);
+ mutex_unlock(&st_ops_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ args->a += 10;
+ return args->a;
+}
+
BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
@@ -956,6 +1002,10 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_sendmsg, KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_sock_sendmsg, KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getsockname, KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getpeername, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
@@ -1075,6 +1125,144 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_testmod_ops2 = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
+static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int st_ops_gen_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+ if (strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_prologue") &&
+ strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_pro_epilogue"))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* r6 = r1[0]; // r6 will be "struct st_ops *args". r1 is "u64 *ctx".
+ * r7 = r6->a;
+ * r7 += 1000;
+ * r6->a = r7;
+ */
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, 1000);
+ *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = prog->insnsi[0];
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
+static int st_ops_gen_epilogue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ s16 ctx_stack_off)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+ if (strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_epilogue") &&
+ strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_pro_epilogue"))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* r1 = stack[ctx_stack_off]; // r1 will be "u64 *ctx"
+ * r1 = r1[0]; // r1 will be "struct st_ops *args"
+ * r6 = r1->a;
+ * r6 += 10000;
+ * r1->a = r6;
+ * r0 = r6;
+ * r0 *= 2;
+ * BPF_EXIT;
+ */
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP, ctx_stack_off);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 10000);
+ *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_0, 2);
+ *insn++ = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
+static int st_ops_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ int off, int size)
+{
+ if (off < 0 || off + size > sizeof(struct st_ops_args))
+ return -EACCES;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops st_ops_verifier_ops = {
+ .is_valid_access = bpf_testmod_ops_is_valid_access,
+ .btf_struct_access = st_ops_btf_struct_access,
+ .gen_prologue = st_ops_gen_prologue,
+ .gen_epilogue = st_ops_gen_epilogue,
+ .get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
+};
+
+static struct bpf_testmod_st_ops st_ops_cfi_stubs = {
+ .test_prologue = bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_prologue,
+ .test_epilogue = bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_epilogue,
+ .test_pro_epilogue = bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_pro_epilogue,
+};
+
+static int st_ops_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ if (st_ops) {
+ pr_err("st_ops has already been registered\n");
+ err = -EEXIST;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ st_ops = kdata;
+
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void st_ops_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&st_ops_mutex);
+ st_ops = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&st_ops_mutex);
+}
+
+static int st_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int st_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops testmod_st_ops = {
+ .verifier_ops = &st_ops_verifier_ops,
+ .init = st_ops_init,
+ .init_member = st_ops_init_member,
+ .reg = st_ops_reg,
+ .unreg = st_ops_unreg,
+ .cfi_stubs = &st_ops_cfi_stubs,
+ .name = "bpf_testmod_st_ops",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a);
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
@@ -1092,8 +1280,10 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
+ ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_bpf_testmod_ops, bpf_testmod_ops);
ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_testmod_ops2, bpf_testmod_ops2);
+ ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&testmod_st_ops, bpf_testmod_st_ops);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_testmod_dtors,
ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_testmod_dtors),
THIS_MODULE);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index fe0d402b0d65..3241a9d796ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -94,4 +94,15 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops2 {
int (*test_1)(void);
};
+struct st_ops_args {
+ int a;
+};
+
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops {
+ int (*test_prologue)(struct st_ops_args *args);
+ int (*test_epilogue)(struct st_ops_args *args);
+ int (*test_pro_epilogue)(struct st_ops_args *args);
+ struct module *owner;
+};
+
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index e587a79f2239..0df429a0edaa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -144,4 +144,10 @@ void bpf_kfunc_dynptr_test(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__nulla
struct bpf_testmod_ctx *bpf_testmod_ctx_create(int *err) __ksym;
void bpf_testmod_ctx_release(struct bpf_testmod_ctx *ctx) __ksym;
+struct st_ops_args;
+int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args) __ksym;
+
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a293a35b0dcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_syscall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "struct_ops_syscall.skel.h"
+
+#define EPILOGUE_A 10000
+#define PROLOGUE_A 1000
+#define KFUNC_A10 10
+#define SUBPROG_A 1
+
+#define SUBPROG_TEST_MAIN SUBPROG_A
+#define KFUNC_TEST_MAIN (KFUNC_A10 + SUBPROG_A)
+
+struct st_ops_args {
+ int a;
+};
+
+static void do_test(struct struct_ops_syscall *skel,
+ struct bpf_map *st_ops_map, int main_prog_a)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ int err, prog_fd, expected_a;
+ struct st_ops_args args;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ topts.ctx_in = &args;
+ topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args);
+
+ link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(st_ops_map);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+ return;
+
+ /* gen_prologue + main prog */
+ expected_a = PROLOGUE_A + main_prog_a;
+ memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.syscall_prologue);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(args.a, expected_a, "args.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "topts.retval");
+
+ /* main prog + gen_epilogue */
+ expected_a = main_prog_a + EPILOGUE_A;
+ memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.syscall_epilogue);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(args.a, expected_a, "args.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, expected_a * 2, "topts.retval");
+
+ /* gen_prologue + main prog + gen_epilogue */
+ expected_a = PROLOGUE_A + main_prog_a + EPILOGUE_A;
+ memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.syscall_pro_epilogue);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(args.a, expected_a, "args.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, expected_a * 2, "topts.retval");
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+}
+
+void test_struct_ops_syscall(void)
+{
+ struct struct_ops_syscall *skel;
+
+ skel = struct_ops_syscall__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("subprog"))
+ do_test(skel, skel->maps.pro_epilogue_subprog_ops,
+ SUBPROG_TEST_MAIN);
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("kfunc"))
+ do_test(skel, skel->maps.pro_epilogue_kfunc_ops,
+ KFUNC_TEST_MAIN);
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("tailcall")) {
+ const int zero = 0;
+ int prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_epilogue_subprog);
+ int map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.epilogue_map);
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &zero, &prog_fd, 0);
+ if (ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update(epilogue_map)"))
+ do_test(skel, skel->maps.pro_epilogue_tail_ops,
+ SUBPROG_TEST_MAIN);
+ }
+
+ struct_ops_syscall__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_syscall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ee153461d9f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_syscall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} epilogue_map SEC(".maps");
+
+static __noinline int subprog(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ args->a += 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_prologue_subprog")
+int BPF_PROG(test_prologue_subprog, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_subprog")
+int BPF_PROG(test_epilogue_subprog, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_pro_epilogue_subprog")
+int BPF_PROG(test_pro_epilogue_subprog, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_prologue_kfunc")
+int BPF_PROG(test_prologue_kfunc, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(args);
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_kfunc")
+int BPF_PROG(test_epilogue_kfunc, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(args);
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_pro_epilogue_kfunc")
+int BPF_PROG(test_pro_epilogue_kfunc, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(args);
+ subprog(args);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_tail")
+int test_epilogue_tail(unsigned long long *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_tail_call_static(ctx, &epilogue_map, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops pro_epilogue_subprog_ops = {
+ .test_prologue = (void *)test_prologue_subprog,
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_subprog,
+ .test_pro_epilogue = (void *)test_pro_epilogue_subprog,
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops pro_epilogue_kfunc_ops = {
+ .test_prologue = (void *)test_prologue_kfunc,
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_kfunc,
+ .test_pro_epilogue = (void *)test_pro_epilogue_kfunc,
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops pro_epilogue_tail_ops = {
+ .test_prologue = (void *)test_prologue_subprog,
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_tail,
+ .test_pro_epilogue = (void *)test_pro_epilogue_subprog,
+};
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int syscall_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue(args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int syscall_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int syscall_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue(args);
+}
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 18:49 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Add gen_epilogue and allow kfunc call in pro/epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-14 20:56 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:14 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-17 22:25 ` Amery Hung
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Export bpf_base_func_proto Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-08-14 20:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/test: test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 23:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-16 0:23 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-16 1:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-16 17:27 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-16 20:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-19 22:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Add module parameter to " Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Allow pro/epilogue to call kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-14 22:17 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 23:47 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add kfunc call test in gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240813184943.3759630-4-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox