public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Add module parameter to gen_prologue and gen_epilogue
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:49:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240813184943.3759630-5-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813184943.3759630-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This patch adds a "struct module **module" arg to the .gen_prologue
and .gen_epilogue. This will allow the .gen_pro/epilogue to
make kfunc call because the verifer needs to know the kfunc's BTF.
The next patch will figure the kfunc's BTF from the module.
It also exposes the "btf_get_module_btf" function to help
figuring out the btf from a module.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h                                   | 4 ++--
 include/linux/btf.h                                   | 1 +
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                                      | 2 +-
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c                                   | 3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                                 | 4 ++--
 net/core/filter.c                                     | 6 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 4 ++--
 7 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 2de67bc497f4..9787532813e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -973,9 +973,9 @@ struct bpf_verifier_ops {
 				const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
 	int (*gen_prologue)(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool direct_write,
-			    const struct bpf_prog *prog);
+			    const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct module **module);
 	int (*gen_epilogue)(struct bpf_insn *insn, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
-			    s16 ctx_stack_off);
+			    s16 ctx_stack_off, struct module **module);
 	int (*gen_ld_abs)(const struct bpf_insn *orig,
 			  struct bpf_insn *insn_buf);
 	u32 (*convert_ctx_access)(enum bpf_access_type type,
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index cffb43133c68..177187fa3819 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ bool btf_is_prog_ctx_type(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 int get_kern_ctx_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type);
 bool btf_types_are_same(const struct btf *btf1, u32 id1,
 			const struct btf *btf2, u32 id2);
+struct btf *btf_get_module_btf(const struct module *module);
 #else
 static inline const struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf,
 						    u32 type_id)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 95426d5b634e..b230f7ff9388 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -7970,7 +7970,7 @@ struct module *btf_try_get_module(const struct btf *btf)
 /* Returns struct btf corresponding to the struct module.
  * This function can return NULL or ERR_PTR.
  */
-static struct btf *btf_get_module_btf(const struct module *module)
+struct btf *btf_get_module_btf(const struct module *module)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES
 	struct btf_module *btf_mod, *tmp;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index 8ba73042a239..0be053d86b56 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -2503,7 +2503,8 @@ static u32 cg_sockopt_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
 
 static int cg_sockopt_get_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
 				   bool direct_write,
-				   const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+				   const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				   struct module **module)
 {
 	/* Nothing to do for sockopt argument. The data is kzalloc'ated.
 	 */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bbb655f0c7b5..5e995b7884fb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19622,7 +19622,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 
 	if (ops->gen_epilogue) {
 		epilogue_cnt = ops->gen_epilogue(epilogue_buf, env->prog,
-						 -(subprogs[0].stack_depth + 8));
+						 -(subprogs[0].stack_depth + 8), NULL);
 		if (epilogue_cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(epilogue_buf)) {
 			verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -19647,7 +19647,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		cnt = ops->gen_prologue(insn_buf, env->seen_direct_write,
-					env->prog);
+					env->prog, NULL);
 		if (cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) {
 			verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 78a6f746ea0b..65d219e71ae8 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -8844,7 +8844,7 @@ static bool sock_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 }
 
 static int bpf_noop_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
-			     const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+			     const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct module **module)
 {
 	/* Neither direct read nor direct write requires any preliminary
 	 * action.
@@ -8927,7 +8927,7 @@ static int bpf_gen_ld_abs(const struct bpf_insn *orig,
 }
 
 static int tc_cls_act_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
-			       const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+			       const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct module **module)
 {
 	return bpf_unclone_prologue(insn_buf, direct_write, prog, TC_ACT_SHOT);
 }
@@ -9263,7 +9263,7 @@ static bool sock_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 }
 
 static int sk_skb_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
-			   const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+			   const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct module **module)
 {
 	return bpf_unclone_prologue(insn_buf, direct_write, prog, SK_DROP);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 7194330bdefc..4c75346376d9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
 }
 
 static int st_ops_gen_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
-			       const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+			       const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct module **module)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
 
@@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ static int st_ops_gen_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
 }
 
 static int st_ops_gen_epilogue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
-			       s16 ctx_stack_off)
+			       s16 ctx_stack_off, struct module **module)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
 
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-13 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13 18:49 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Add gen_epilogue and allow kfunc call in pro/epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-14 20:56   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:14     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-17 22:25   ` Amery Hung
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Export bpf_base_func_proto Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/test: test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-14 20:48   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 23:41     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-16  0:23       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-16  1:50         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-16 17:27           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-16 20:27             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-19 22:30               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Allow pro/epilogue to call kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-14 22:17   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 23:47     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-13 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add kfunc call test in gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240813184943.3759630-5-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox