BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: attach struct_ops maps before test prog runs
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:34:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821233440.1855263-4-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821233440.1855263-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

In test_loader based tests to bpf_map__attach_struct_ops()
before call to bpf_prog_test_run_opts() in order to trigger
bpf_struct_ops->reg() callbacks on kernel side.
This allows to use __retval macro for struct_ops tests.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 12b0c41e8d64..01feba554a41 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -729,11 +729,13 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
 {
 	struct test_subspec *subspec = unpriv ? &spec->unpriv : &spec->priv;
 	struct bpf_program *tprog = NULL, *tprog_iter;
+	struct bpf_link *link, *links[32] = {};
 	struct test_spec *spec_iter;
 	struct cap_state caps = {};
 	struct bpf_object *tobj;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	int retval, err, i;
+	int links_cnt = 0;
 	bool should_load;
 
 	if (!test__start_subtest(subspec->name))
@@ -823,6 +825,26 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
 		if (restore_capabilities(&caps))
 			goto tobj_cleanup;
 
+		/* Do bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() for each struct_ops map.
+		 * This should trigger bpf_struct_ops->reg callback on kernel side.
+		 */
+		bpf_object__for_each_map(map, tobj) {
+			if (!bpf_map__autocreate(map) ||
+			    bpf_map__type(map) != BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
+				continue;
+			if (links_cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(links)) {
+				PRINT_FAIL("too many struct_ops maps");
+				goto tobj_cleanup;
+			}
+			link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);
+			if (!link) {
+				PRINT_FAIL("bpf_map__attach_struct_ops failed for map %s: err=%d\n",
+					   bpf_map__name(map), err);
+				goto tobj_cleanup;
+			}
+			links[links_cnt++] = link;
+		}
+
 		if (tester->pre_execution_cb) {
 			err = tester->pre_execution_cb(tobj);
 			if (err) {
@@ -837,9 +859,14 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
 			PRINT_FAIL("Unexpected retval: %d != %d\n", retval, subspec->retval);
 			goto tobj_cleanup;
 		}
+		/* redo bpf_map__attach_struct_ops for each test */
+		while (links_cnt > 0)
+			bpf_link__destroy(links[--links_cnt]);
 	}
 
 tobj_cleanup:
+	while (links_cnt > 0)
+		bpf_link__destroy(links[--links_cnt]);
 	bpf_object__close(tobj);
 subtest_cleanup:
 	test__end_subtest();
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-21 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-21 23:34 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add gen_epilogue and allow kfunc call in pro/epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22  0:22   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22  0:30     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  0:34       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22  0:38         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  0:52           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: Export bpf_base_func_proto Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall epilogue test Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: Add module parameter to gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: Allow pro/epilogue to call kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22  1:32   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22  6:09     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 13:47       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 17:38         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 17:58           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add kfunc call test in gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240821233440.1855263-4-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox