From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall epilogue test
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:34:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821233440.1855263-6-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821233440.1855263-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This patch adds a gen_epilogue test to test a main prog
using a bpf_tail_call.
A non test_loader test is used. The tailcall target program,
"test_epilogue_subprog", needs to be used in a struct_ops map
before it can be loaded. Another struct_ops map is also needed
to host the actual "test_epilogue_tailcall" struct_ops program
that does the bpf_tail_call. The earlier test_loader patch
will attach all struct_ops maps but the bpf_testmod.c does
not support >1 attached struct_ops.
The earlier patch used the test_loader which has already covered
checking for the patched pro/epilogue instructions. This is done
by the __xlated tag.
This patch goes for the regular skel load and syscall test to do
the tailcall test that can also allow to directly pass the
the "struct st_ops_args *args" as ctx_in to the
SEC("syscall") program.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c | 38 ++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/epilogue_tailcall.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/epilogue_tailcall.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
index 69e4a5a1756d..98de677c55a9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
@@ -4,9 +4,47 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "pro_epilogue_subprog.skel.h"
#include "pro_epilogue_kfunc.skel.h"
+#include "epilogue_tailcall.skel.h"
+
+struct st_ops_args {
+ int a;
+};
+
+static void test_tailcall(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ struct epilogue_tailcall *skel;
+ struct st_ops_args args;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel = epilogue_tailcall__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "epilogue_tailcall__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ topts.ctx_in = &args;
+ topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args);
+
+ skel->links.epilogue_tailcall =
+ bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.epilogue_tailcall);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.epilogue_tailcall, "attach_struct_ops"))
+ goto done;
+
+ /* tailcall prog + gen_epilogue */
+ memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.syscall_epilogue_tailcall);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(args.a, 10001, "args.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 10001 * 2, "topts.retval");
+
+done:
+ epilogue_tailcall__destroy(skel);
+}
void test_pro_epilogue(void)
{
RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue_subprog);
RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue_kfunc);
+ if (test__start_subtest("tailcall"))
+ test_tailcall();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/epilogue_tailcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/epilogue_tailcall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7275dd594de0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/epilogue_tailcall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+static __noinline __used int subprog(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ args->a += 1;
+ return args->a;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_subprog")
+int BPF_PROG(test_epilogue_subprog, struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ subprog(args);
+ return args->a;
+}
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __array(values, void (void));
+} epilogue_map SEC(".maps") = {
+ .values = {
+ [0] = (void *)&test_epilogue_subprog,
+ }
+};
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_tailcall")
+int test_epilogue_tailcall(unsigned long long *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_tail_call(ctx, &epilogue_map, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops epilogue_tailcall = {
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_tailcall,
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops epilogue_subprog = {
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_subprog,
+};
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int syscall_epilogue_tailcall(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(args);
+}
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 23:34 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add gen_epilogue and allow kfunc call in pro/epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 0:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 0:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22 0:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 0:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22 0:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: Export bpf_base_func_proto Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: attach struct_ops maps before test prog runs Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: Add module parameter to " Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: Allow pro/epilogue to call kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 1:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 6:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 13:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 17:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-22 17:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add kfunc call test in gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821233440.1855263-6-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox