[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 26/87] samples/bpf: Fix a resource leak

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 26/87] samples/bpf: Fix a resource leak

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>

[ Upstream commit f3ef53174b23246fe9bc2bbc2542f3a3856fa1e2 ]

The opened file should be closed in show_sockopts(), otherwise resource
leak will occur that this problem was discovered by reading code

Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241010014126.2573-1-zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock.c b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock.c
index a0811df888f45..8ca2a445ffa15 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock.c
@@ -178,8 +178,10 @@ static int show_sockopts(int family)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (get_bind_to_device(sd, name, sizeof(name)) < 0)
+	if (get_bind_to_device(sd, name, sizeof(name)) < 0) {
+		close(sd);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	mark = get_somark(sd);
 	prio = get_priority(sd);
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 43/87] bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace

[Sasha Levin]

From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>

[ Upstream commit d6083f040d5d8f8d748462c77e90547097df936e ]

There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a
combination of tail calls and freplace.

In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of
tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in
entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop:

entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc.

The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to
zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism
to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic.

To fix this issue, the solution is twofold:

1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a
   prog_array map.
2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map
   with an freplace program.

This ensures that:

* If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program,
  it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map.
* If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its
  subprograms can be extended by an freplace program.

Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return
-EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a
prog_array map.

Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a
tab for proper formatting.

Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241015150207.70264-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h     | 17 +++++++++++----
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c   | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/core.c       |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c    |  7 +++---
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index eb1d3a2fe3339..e2fe0c67e1077 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1292,8 +1292,12 @@ void *__bpf_dynptr_data_rw(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 len);
 bool __bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
-int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
-int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
+int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+			     struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+			     struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog);
+int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+			       struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+			       struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog);
 struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key,
 					  struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info);
 void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
@@ -1374,12 +1378,14 @@ void bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(u32 size);
 bool bpf_prog_has_trampoline(const struct bpf_prog *prog);
 #else
 static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
-					   struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+					   struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+					   struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
 static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
-					     struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+					     struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+					     struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
@@ -1483,6 +1489,9 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	bool xdp_has_frags;
 	bool exception_cb;
 	bool exception_boundary;
+	bool is_extended; /* true if extended by freplace program */
+	u64 prog_array_member_cnt; /* counts how many times as member of prog_array */
+	struct mutex ext_mutex; /* mutex for is_extended and prog_array_member_cnt */
 	struct bpf_arena *arena;
 	/* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
 	const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index a5c6f8aa49015..e6dc34e314807 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -947,22 +947,44 @@ static void *prog_fd_array_get_ptr(struct bpf_map *map,
 				   struct file *map_file, int fd)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = bpf_prog_get(fd);
+	bool is_extended;
 
 	if (IS_ERR(prog))
 		return prog;
 
-	if (!bpf_prog_map_compatible(map, prog)) {
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT ||
+	    !bpf_prog_map_compatible(map, prog)) {
 		bpf_prog_put(prog);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&prog->aux->ext_mutex);
+	is_extended = prog->aux->is_extended;
+	if (!is_extended)
+		prog->aux->prog_array_member_cnt++;
+	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->ext_mutex);
+	if (is_extended) {
+		/* Extended prog can not be tail callee. It's to prevent a
+		 * potential infinite loop like:
+		 * tail callee prog entry -> tail callee prog subprog ->
+		 * freplace prog entry --tailcall-> tail callee prog entry.
+		 */
+		bpf_prog_put(prog);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+	}
+
 	return prog;
 }
 
 static void prog_fd_array_put_ptr(struct bpf_map *map, void *ptr, bool need_defer)
 {
+	struct bpf_prog *prog = ptr;
+
+	mutex_lock(&prog->aux->ext_mutex);
+	prog->aux->prog_array_member_cnt--;
+	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->ext_mutex);
 	/* bpf_prog is freed after one RCU or tasks trace grace period */
-	bpf_prog_put(ptr);
+	bpf_prog_put(prog);
 }
 
 static u32 prog_fd_array_sys_lookup_elem(void *ptr)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 4e07cc057d6f2..ea7f59374b378 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flag
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&fp->aux->ksym_prefix.lnode);
 #endif
 	mutex_init(&fp->aux->used_maps_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&fp->aux->ext_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&fp->aux->dst_mutex);
 
 	return fp;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index b282ed1250358..f1be9cf46b5ff 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3289,7 +3289,8 @@ static void bpf_tracing_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_link, link.link);
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link,
-						tr_link->trampoline));
+						tr_link->trampoline,
+						tr_link->tgt_prog));
 
 	bpf_trampoline_put(tr_link->trampoline);
 
@@ -3429,7 +3430,7 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	 *   in prog->aux
 	 *
 	 * - if prog->aux->dst_trampoline is NULL, the program has already been
-         *   attached to a target and its initial target was cleared (below)
+	 *   attached to a target and its initial target was cleared (below)
 	 *
 	 * - if tgt_prog != NULL, the caller specified tgt_prog_fd +
 	 *   target_btf_id using the link_create API.
@@ -3504,7 +3505,7 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	if (err)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	err = bpf_trampoline_link_prog(&link->link, tr);
+	err = bpf_trampoline_link_prog(&link->link, tr, tgt_prog);
 	if (err) {
 		bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
 		link = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index f8302a5ca400d..9f36c049f4c28 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -523,7 +523,27 @@ static enum bpf_tramp_prog_type bpf_attach_type_to_tramp(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 }
 
-static int __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+static int bpf_freplace_check_tgt_prog(struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = tgt_prog->aux;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&aux->ext_mutex);
+	if (aux->prog_array_member_cnt)
+		/* Program extensions can not extend target prog when the target
+		 * prog has been updated to any prog_array map as tail callee.
+		 * It's to prevent a potential infinite loop like:
+		 * tgt prog entry -> tgt prog subprog -> freplace prog entry
+		 * --tailcall-> tgt prog entry.
+		 */
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	aux->is_extended = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+				      struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+				      struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	enum bpf_tramp_prog_type kind;
 	struct bpf_tramp_link *link_exiting;
@@ -544,6 +564,9 @@ static int __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_tr
 		/* Cannot attach extension if fentry/fexit are in use. */
 		if (cnt)
 			return -EBUSY;
+		err = bpf_freplace_check_tgt_prog(tgt_prog);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 		tr->extension_prog = link->link.prog;
 		return bpf_arch_text_poke(tr->func.addr, BPF_MOD_JUMP, NULL,
 					  link->link.prog->bpf_func);
@@ -570,17 +593,21 @@ static int __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_tr
 	return err;
 }
 
-int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+			     struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+			     struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	int err;
 
 	mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
-	err = __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(link, tr);
+	err = __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(link, tr, tgt_prog);
 	mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+static int __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+					struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+					struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	enum bpf_tramp_prog_type kind;
 	int err;
@@ -591,6 +618,8 @@ static int __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_
 		err = bpf_arch_text_poke(tr->func.addr, BPF_MOD_JUMP,
 					 tr->extension_prog->bpf_func, NULL);
 		tr->extension_prog = NULL;
+		guard(mutex)(&tgt_prog->aux->ext_mutex);
+		tgt_prog->aux->is_extended = false;
 		return err;
 	}
 	hlist_del_init(&link->tramp_hlist);
@@ -599,12 +628,14 @@ static int __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_
 }
 
 /* bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog() should never fail. */
-int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
+int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
+			       struct bpf_trampoline *tr,
+			       struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog)
 {
 	int err;
 
 	mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
-	err = __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(link, tr);
+	err = __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(link, tr, tgt_prog);
 	mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -619,7 +650,7 @@ static void bpf_shim_tramp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 	if (!shim_link->trampoline)
 		return;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link, shim_link->trampoline));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link, shim_link->trampoline, NULL));
 	bpf_trampoline_put(shim_link->trampoline);
 }
 
@@ -733,7 +764,7 @@ int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	err = __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(&shim_link->link, tr);
+	err = __bpf_trampoline_link_prog(&shim_link->link, tr, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
 
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 72/87] bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit b9e9ed90b10c82a4e9d4d70a2890f06bfcdd3b78 ]

For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the
last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke
bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However,
bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock
(raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock
(spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning:

  =============================
  [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
  6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted
  -----------------------------
  test_maps/4881 is trying to lock:
  ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70
  other info that might help us debug this:
  context-{5:5}
  2 locks held by test_maps/4881:
   #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270
   #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80
  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ...
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0
   dump_stack+0x10/0x20
   __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0
   lock_acquire+0x182/0x450
   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70
   bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70
   bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110
   bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0
   free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0
   htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80
   bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270
   htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80
   bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270
   bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380
   __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0
   __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60
   x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0
   do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for
map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes
idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a
similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is
still a spinlock.

Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking
htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring
the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map
pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion.
Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these
to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map.

There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr:

(1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value())
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of
htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(),
because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems.
It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the
invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release
the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer
of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and
releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old
element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old
element as well.

(2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value())
Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(),
htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch().

For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after
htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just
like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list
and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe
to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these
elements have been removed from the hash llist.

Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation,
__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept
it as is.

(3) fd_htab_map_free()
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t.

(4) bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem()
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t.

After moving free_htab_elem() outside htab bucket lock scope, using
pcpu_freelist_push() instead of __pcpu_freelist_push() to disable
the irq before freeing elements, and protecting the invocations of
bpf_mem_cache_free() with migrate_{disable|enable} pair.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106063542.357743-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index bcb74ac880cb5..a47fc3d01c378 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -896,9 +896,12 @@ static int htab_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
 static void htab_elem_free(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
 {
 	check_and_free_fields(htab, l);
+
+	migrate_disable();
 	if (htab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH)
 		bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->pcpu_ma, l->ptr_to_pptr);
 	bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, l);
+	migrate_enable();
 }
 
 static void htab_put_fd_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
@@ -948,7 +951,7 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
 	if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) {
 		bpf_map_dec_elem_count(&htab->map);
 		check_and_free_fields(htab, l);
-		__pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode);
+		pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode);
 	} else {
 		dec_elem_count(htab);
 		htab_elem_free(htab, l);
@@ -1018,7 +1021,6 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 			 */
 			pl_new = this_cpu_ptr(htab->extra_elems);
 			l_new = *pl_new;
-			htab_put_fd_value(htab, old_elem);
 			*pl_new = old_elem;
 		} else {
 			struct pcpu_freelist_node *l;
@@ -1104,6 +1106,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	struct htab_elem *l_new = NULL, *l_old;
 	struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	void *old_map_ptr;
 	struct bucket *b;
 	u32 key_size, hash;
 	int ret;
@@ -1182,12 +1185,27 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
 	if (l_old) {
 		hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l_old->hash_node);
+
+		/* l_old has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems, free
+		 * its special fields before it is available for reuse. Also
+		 * save the old map pointer in htab of maps before unlock
+		 * and release it after unlock.
+		 */
+		old_map_ptr = NULL;
+		if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) {
+			if (map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr)
+				old_map_ptr = fd_htab_map_get_ptr(map, l_old);
+			check_and_free_fields(htab, l_old);
+		}
+	}
+	htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
+	if (l_old) {
+		if (old_map_ptr)
+			map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr(map, old_map_ptr, true);
 		if (!htab_is_prealloc(htab))
 			free_htab_elem(htab, l_old);
-		else
-			check_and_free_fields(htab, l_old);
 	}
-	ret = 0;
+	return 0;
 err:
 	htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
 	return ret;
@@ -1431,15 +1449,15 @@ static long htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 		return ret;
 
 	l = lookup_elem_raw(head, hash, key, key_size);
-
-	if (l) {
+	if (l)
 		hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l->hash_node);
-		free_htab_elem(htab, l);
-	} else {
+	else
 		ret = -ENOENT;
-	}
 
 	htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
+
+	if (l)
+		free_htab_elem(htab, l);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1852,13 +1870,14 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 			 * may cause deadlock. See comments in function
 			 * prealloc_lru_pop(). Let us do bpf_lru_push_free()
 			 * after releasing the bucket lock.
+			 *
+			 * For htab of maps, htab_put_fd_value() in
+			 * free_htab_elem() may acquire a spinlock with bucket
+			 * lock being held and it violates the lock rule, so
+			 * invoke free_htab_elem() after unlock as well.
 			 */
-			if (is_lru_map) {
-				l->batch_flink = node_to_free;
-				node_to_free = l;
-			} else {
-				free_htab_elem(htab, l);
-			}
+			l->batch_flink = node_to_free;
+			node_to_free = l;
 		}
 		dst_key += key_size;
 		dst_val += value_size;
@@ -1870,7 +1889,10 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	while (node_to_free) {
 		l = node_to_free;
 		node_to_free = node_to_free->batch_flink;
-		htab_lru_push_free(htab, l);
+		if (is_lru_map)
+			htab_lru_push_free(htab, l);
+		else
+			free_htab_elem(htab, l);
 	}
 
 next_batch:
-- 
2.43.0