public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_precision() did any updates
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 12:19:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250524191932.389444-6-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250524191932.389444-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Add an out parameter to `propagate_precision()` to record whether any
new precision bits were set during its execution.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fa0f6bce1e2a..59d7e29dd637 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4663,7 +4663,9 @@ static void mark_all_scalars_imprecise(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
  * finalized states which help in short circuiting more future states.
  */
 static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
-				  struct bpf_verifier_state *starting_state, int regno)
+				  struct bpf_verifier_state *starting_state,
+				  int regno,
+				  bool *changed)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *st = starting_state;
 	struct backtrack_state *bt = &env->bt;
@@ -4671,13 +4673,14 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	int last_idx = starting_state->insn_idx;
 	int subseq_idx = -1;
 	struct bpf_func_state *func;
+	bool tmp, skip_first = true;
 	struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
-	bool skip_first = true;
 	int i, fr, err;
 
 	if (!env->bpf_capable)
 		return 0;
 
+	changed = changed ?: &tmp;
 	/* set frame number from which we are starting to backtrack */
 	bt_init(bt, starting_state->curframe);
 
@@ -4723,8 +4726,10 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				for_each_set_bit(i, mask, 32) {
 					reg = &st->frame[0]->regs[i];
 					bt_clear_reg(bt, i);
-					if (reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE)
+					if (reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
 						reg->precise = true;
+						*changed = true;
+					}
 				}
 				return 0;
 			}
@@ -4783,10 +4788,12 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 					bt_clear_frame_reg(bt, fr, i);
 					continue;
 				}
-				if (reg->precise)
+				if (reg->precise) {
 					bt_clear_frame_reg(bt, fr, i);
-				else
+				} else {
 					reg->precise = true;
+					*changed = true;
+				}
 			}
 
 			bitmap_from_u64(mask, bt_frame_stack_mask(bt, fr));
@@ -4801,10 +4808,12 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 					continue;
 				}
 				reg = &func->stack[i].spilled_ptr;
-				if (reg->precise)
+				if (reg->precise) {
 					bt_clear_frame_slot(bt, fr, i);
-				else
+				} else {
 					reg->precise = true;
+					*changed = true;
+				}
 			}
 			if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) {
 				fmt_reg_mask(env->tmp_str_buf, TMP_STR_BUF_LEN,
@@ -4840,7 +4849,7 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 
 int mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
 {
-	return __mark_chain_precision(env, env->cur_state, regno);
+	return __mark_chain_precision(env, env->cur_state, regno, NULL);
 }
 
 /* mark_chain_precision_batch() assumes that env->bt is set in the caller to
@@ -4849,7 +4858,7 @@ int mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
 static int mark_chain_precision_batch(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				      struct bpf_verifier_state *starting_state)
 {
-	return __mark_chain_precision(env, starting_state, -1);
+	return __mark_chain_precision(env, starting_state, -1, NULL);
 }
 
 static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
@@ -18868,7 +18877,9 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
  * propagate them into the current state
  */
 static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
-			       const struct bpf_verifier_state *old)
+			       const struct bpf_verifier_state *old,
+			       struct bpf_verifier_state *cur,
+			       bool *changed)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *state_reg;
 	struct bpf_func_state *state;
@@ -18916,7 +18927,7 @@ static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			verbose(env, "\n");
 	}
 
-	err = mark_chain_precision_batch(env, env->cur_state);
+	err = __mark_chain_precision(env, cur, -1, changed);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
@@ -19239,7 +19250,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
 			 */
 			if (is_jmp_point(env, env->insn_idx))
 				err = err ? : push_jmp_history(env, cur, 0, 0);
-			err = err ? : propagate_precision(env, &sl->state);
+			err = err ? : propagate_precision(env, &sl->state, cur, NULL);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 			return 1;
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-24 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-24 19:19 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] Revert "bpf: use common instruction history across all states" Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] bpf: compute SCCs in program control flow graph Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] bpf: frame_insn_idx() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] bpf: starting_state parameter for __mark_chain_precision() Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_liveness() did any updates Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] bpf: move REG_LIVE_DONE check to clean_live_states() Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: remove {update,get}_loop_entry functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: include backedges in peak_states stat Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: tests with a loop state missing read/precision mark Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-27 21:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-05 23:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06  2:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250524191932.389444-6-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox