public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_liveness() did any updates
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 12:19:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250524191932.389444-7-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250524191932.389444-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Add an out parameter to `propagate_liveness()` to record whether any
new liveness bits were set during its execution.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 59d7e29dd637..0d7fb2e0e1c6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -18831,12 +18831,15 @@ static int propagate_liveness_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
  */
 static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			      const struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
-			      struct bpf_verifier_state *vparent)
+			      struct bpf_verifier_state *vparent,
+			      bool *changed)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *state_reg, *parent_reg;
 	struct bpf_func_state *state, *parent;
 	int i, frame, err = 0;
+	bool tmp;
 
+	changed = changed ?: &tmp;
 	if (vparent->curframe != vstate->curframe) {
 		WARN(1, "propagate_live: parent frame %d current frame %d\n",
 		     vparent->curframe, vstate->curframe);
@@ -18855,6 +18858,7 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 						     &parent_reg[i]);
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
+			*changed |= err > 0;
 			if (err == REG_LIVE_READ64)
 				mark_insn_zext(env, &parent_reg[i]);
 		}
@@ -18866,6 +18870,7 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			state_reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr;
 			err = propagate_liveness_reg(env, state_reg,
 						     parent_reg);
+			*changed |= err > 0;
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
 		}
@@ -19241,7 +19246,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
 			 * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning
 			 * this state and will pop a new one.
 			 */
-			err = propagate_liveness(env, &sl->state, cur);
+			err = propagate_liveness(env, &sl->state, cur, NULL);
 
 			/* if previous state reached the exit with precision and
 			 * current state is equivalent to it (except precision marks)
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-24 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-24 19:19 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] Revert "bpf: use common instruction history across all states" Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] bpf: compute SCCs in program control flow graph Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] bpf: frame_insn_idx() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] bpf: starting_state parameter for __mark_chain_precision() Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_precision() did any updates Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] bpf: move REG_LIVE_DONE check to clean_live_states() Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: remove {update,get}_loop_entry functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: include backedges in peak_states stat Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-24 19:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: tests with a loop state missing read/precision mark Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-27 21:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-05 23:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06  2:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250524191932.389444-7-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox