From: KaFai Wan <mannkafai@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: KaFai Wan <mannkafai@gmail.com>,
syzbot+0903f6d7f285e41cdf10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: fix WARNING in __bpf_prog_ret0_warn when jit failed
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 21:33:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250526133358.2594176-1-mannkafai@gmail.com> (raw)
syzkaller reported an issue:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 217 at kernel/bpf/core.c:2357 __bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u32:6 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc4-syzkaller-00040-g8bac8898fe39 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
RIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_ret0_warn+0xa/0x20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2357
RSP: 0018:ffffc900031f6c18 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000006e000 RCX: 1ffff9200000dc06
RDX: ffff8880234ba440 RSI: ffffffff81ca6979 RDI: ffff888031e93040
RBP: ffffc900031f6cb8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88802b61e010
R13: ffff888031e93040 R14: 00000000000000a0 R15: ffff88802c3d4800
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d6ce2000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055557b6d2ca8 CR3: 000000002473e000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
cls_bpf_classify+0x74a/0x1110 net/sched/cls_bpf.c:105
...
When creating bpf program, 'fp->jit_requested' depends on bpf_jit_enable.
Currently the value of bpf_jit_enable is available from 0 to 2, 0 means use
interpreter and not jit, 1 and 2 means need to jit. When
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is enabled, bpf_jit_enable is permanently set
to 1, when it's not set or disabled, we can set bpf_jit_enable via proc.
This issue is triggered because of CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set
and bpf_jit_enable is set to 1, causing the arch to attempt JIT the prog,
but jit failed due to FAULT_INJECTION. As a result, incorrectly
treats the program as valid, when the program runs it calls
`__bpf_prog_ret0_warn` and triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE(1).
Reported-by: syzbot+0903f6d7f285e41cdf10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6816e34e.a70a0220.254cdc.002c.GAE@google.com
Fixes: fa9dd599b4da ("bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits")
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <mannkafai@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index a3e571688421..c20babbf998f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
/* In case of BPF to BPF calls, verifier did all the prep
* work with regards to JITing, etc.
*/
- bool jit_needed = false;
+ bool jit_needed = fp->jit_requested;
if (fp->bpf_func)
goto finalize;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-26 13:33 KaFai Wan [this message]
2025-05-27 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: fix WARNING in __bpf_prog_ret0_warn when jit failed patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-07-22 13:28 ` Felix Fietkau
2025-07-25 17:30 ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-25 17:55 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250526133358.2594176-1-mannkafai@gmail.com \
--to=mannkafai@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+0903f6d7f285e41cdf10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox