BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes
@ 2025-10-14 20:20 Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-14 23:01 ` Ihor Solodrai
  2025-10-15  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-14 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team

We started getting a crash in BPF CI, which seems to originate from
test_parse_test_list_file() test and is happening at this line:

  ASSERT_OK(strcmp("test_with_spaces", set.tests[0].name), "test 0 name");

One way we can crash there is if set.cnt zero, which is checked for with
ASSERT_EQ() above, but we proceed after this regardless of the outcome.
Instead of crashing, we should bail out with test failure early.

Similarly, if parse_test_list_file() fails, we shouldn't be even looking
at set, so bail even earlier if ASSERT_OK() fails.

Fixes: 64276f01dce8 ("selftests/bpf: Test_progs can read test lists from file")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
index bb143de68875..fbf0d9c2f58b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
@@ -146,9 +146,12 @@ static void test_parse_test_list_file(void)
 
 	init_test_filter_set(&set);
 
-	ASSERT_OK(parse_test_list_file(tmpfile, &set, true), "parse file");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(parse_test_list_file(tmpfile, &set, true), "parse file"))
+		goto out_fclose;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(set.cnt, 4, "test  count"))
+		goto out_free_set;
 
-	ASSERT_EQ(set.cnt, 4, "test  count");
 	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("test_with_spaces", set.tests[0].name), "test 0 name");
 	ASSERT_EQ(set.tests[0].subtest_cnt, 0, "test 0 subtest count");
 	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testA", set.tests[1].name), "test 1 name");
@@ -158,8 +161,8 @@ static void test_parse_test_list_file(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testB", set.tests[2].name), "test 2 name");
 	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testC_no_eof_newline", set.tests[3].name), "test 3 name");
 
+out_free_set:
 	free_test_filter_set(&set);
-
 out_fclose:
 	fclose(fp);
 out_remove:
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes
  2025-10-14 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-14 23:01 ` Ihor Solodrai
  2025-10-15  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Solodrai @ 2025-10-14 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau; +Cc: kernel-team

On 10/14/25 1:20 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> We started getting a crash in BPF CI, which seems to originate from
> test_parse_test_list_file() test and is happening at this line:
> 
>   ASSERT_OK(strcmp("test_with_spaces", set.tests[0].name), "test 0 name");
> 
> One way we can crash there is if set.cnt zero, which is checked for with
> ASSERT_EQ() above, but we proceed after this regardless of the outcome.
> Instead of crashing, we should bail out with test failure early.
> 
> Similarly, if parse_test_list_file() fails, we shouldn't be even looking
> at set, so bail even earlier if ASSERT_OK() fails.
> 
> Fixes: 64276f01dce8 ("selftests/bpf: Test_progs can read test lists from file")
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

This patch in combination with another arg_parsing.c fix [1] mitigates
recent BPF CI failures:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/18510075579?pr=404

Tested-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251014080323.1660391-1-higuoxing@gmail.com/


> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
> index bb143de68875..fbf0d9c2f58b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arg_parsing.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,12 @@ static void test_parse_test_list_file(void)
>  
>  	init_test_filter_set(&set);
>  
> -	ASSERT_OK(parse_test_list_file(tmpfile, &set, true), "parse file");
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(parse_test_list_file(tmpfile, &set, true), "parse file"))
> +		goto out_fclose;
> +
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(set.cnt, 4, "test  count"))
> +		goto out_free_set;
>  
> -	ASSERT_EQ(set.cnt, 4, "test  count");
>  	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("test_with_spaces", set.tests[0].name), "test 0 name");
>  	ASSERT_EQ(set.tests[0].subtest_cnt, 0, "test 0 subtest count");
>  	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testA", set.tests[1].name), "test 1 name");
> @@ -158,8 +161,8 @@ static void test_parse_test_list_file(void)
>  	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testB", set.tests[2].name), "test 2 name");
>  	ASSERT_OK(strcmp("testC_no_eof_newline", set.tests[3].name), "test 3 name");
>  
> +out_free_set:
>  	free_test_filter_set(&set);
> -
>  out_fclose:
>  	fclose(fp);
>  out_remove:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes
  2025-10-14 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-14 23:01 ` Ihor Solodrai
@ 2025-10-15  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-10-15  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau, kernel-team

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:20:37 -0700 you wrote:
> We started getting a crash in BPF CI, which seems to originate from
> test_parse_test_list_file() test and is happening at this line:
> 
>   ASSERT_OK(strcmp("test_with_spaces", set.tests[0].name), "test 0 name");
> 
> One way we can crash there is if set.cnt zero, which is checked for with
> ASSERT_EQ() above, but we proceed after this regardless of the outcome.
> Instead of crashing, we should bail out with test failure early.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/e603a342cf7e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-15  0:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-14 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make arg_parsing.c more robust to crashes Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-14 23:01 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-15  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox