From: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 22:23:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401142316.2452-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com> (raw)
check_mem_access() matches PTR_TO_BUF via base_type() which strips
PTR_MAYBE_NULL, allowing direct dereference without a null check.
Map iterator ctx->key and ctx->value are PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
On stop callbacks these are NULL, causing a kernel NULL dereference.
Add a type_may_be_null() guard to the PTR_TO_BUF branch, matching the
existing PTR_TO_BTF_ID pattern.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_5f0e2be830ac3243_null_deref_iter+0x10/0x25
Call Trace:
bpf_iter_run_prog+0x1c2/0x2e0
__bpf_hash_map_seq_show+0x120/0x180
bpf_seq_read+0x29c/0x530
vfs_read+0x179/0x930
ksys_read+0xef/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x1290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Fixes: 20b2aff4bc15 ("bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag")
Signed-off-by: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add selftest
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260331172720.29938-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com/
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 937c9adf1b3d..17850836943b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7905,7 +7905,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
} else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) {
err = check_ptr_to_map_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t,
value_regno);
- } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF) {
+ } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF &&
+ !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) {
bool rdonly_mem = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type);
u32 *max_access;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..997389f01ed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Qi Tang */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} hashmap SEC(".maps");
+
+/*
+ * Verify that the verifier rejects direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF
+ * (ctx->key) without a null check. On the iterator stop callback,
+ * ctx->key is NULL, so unconditional access would be a NULL deref.
+ */
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+__failure __msg("invalid mem access")
+int iter_buf_null_deref(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+ /* ctx->key is PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY.
+ * Direct access without null check must be rejected.
+ */
+ volatile __u32 v = *(__u32 *)ctx->key;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verify that access after a null check is still accepted.
+ */
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+__success
+int iter_buf_null_check_ok(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 *key = ctx->key;
+
+ if (!key)
+ return 0;
+
+ volatile __u32 v = *key;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 14:23 Qi Tang [this message]
2026-04-01 14:43 ` [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260401142316.2452-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com \
--to=tpluszz77@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox