* [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers
@ 2026-04-01 14:23 Qi Tang
2026-04-01 14:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Qi Tang @ 2026-04-01 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Cc: Eduard Zingerman, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau,
John Fastabend, Song Liu, bpf, Qi Tang
check_mem_access() matches PTR_TO_BUF via base_type() which strips
PTR_MAYBE_NULL, allowing direct dereference without a null check.
Map iterator ctx->key and ctx->value are PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
On stop callbacks these are NULL, causing a kernel NULL dereference.
Add a type_may_be_null() guard to the PTR_TO_BUF branch, matching the
existing PTR_TO_BTF_ID pattern.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_5f0e2be830ac3243_null_deref_iter+0x10/0x25
Call Trace:
bpf_iter_run_prog+0x1c2/0x2e0
__bpf_hash_map_seq_show+0x120/0x180
bpf_seq_read+0x29c/0x530
vfs_read+0x179/0x930
ksys_read+0xef/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x1290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Fixes: 20b2aff4bc15 ("bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag")
Signed-off-by: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add selftest
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260331172720.29938-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com/
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 937c9adf1b3d..17850836943b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7905,7 +7905,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
} else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) {
err = check_ptr_to_map_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t,
value_regno);
- } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF) {
+ } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF &&
+ !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) {
bool rdonly_mem = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type);
u32 *max_access;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..997389f01ed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iter_buf_null_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Qi Tang */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} hashmap SEC(".maps");
+
+/*
+ * Verify that the verifier rejects direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF
+ * (ctx->key) without a null check. On the iterator stop callback,
+ * ctx->key is NULL, so unconditional access would be a NULL deref.
+ */
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+__failure __msg("invalid mem access")
+int iter_buf_null_deref(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+ /* ctx->key is PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY.
+ * Direct access without null check must be rejected.
+ */
+ volatile __u32 v = *(__u32 *)ctx->key;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verify that access after a null check is still accepted.
+ */
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+__success
+int iter_buf_null_check_ok(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 *key = ctx->key;
+
+ if (!key)
+ return 0;
+
+ volatile __u32 v = *key;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers
2026-04-01 14:23 [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers Qi Tang
@ 2026-04-01 14:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2026-04-01 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qi Tang
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Eduard Zingerman,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, John Fastabend, Song Liu, bpf
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 16:38, Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> check_mem_access() matches PTR_TO_BUF via base_type() which strips
> PTR_MAYBE_NULL, allowing direct dereference without a null check.
>
> Map iterator ctx->key and ctx->value are PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
> On stop callbacks these are NULL, causing a kernel NULL dereference.
>
> Add a type_may_be_null() guard to the PTR_TO_BUF branch, matching the
> existing PTR_TO_BTF_ID pattern.
Just this much info is enough, please drop the stack trace from the commit log.
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_5f0e2be830ac3243_null_deref_iter+0x10/0x25
> Call Trace:
> bpf_iter_run_prog+0x1c2/0x2e0
> __bpf_hash_map_seq_show+0x120/0x180
> bpf_seq_read+0x29c/0x530
> vfs_read+0x179/0x930
> ksys_read+0xef/0x1c0
> do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x1290
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>
> Fixes: 20b2aff4bc15 ("bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag")
> Signed-off-by: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
> ---
The fix looks fine, but please split the kernel fix and selftests into
separate patches.
E.g. look at this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260401-bpf_map_torn_writes-v1-0-782d071c55e7@meta.com
Also, use the subject prefix [PATCH bpf ...] for v3.
pw-bot: cr
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-01 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-01 14:23 [PATCH v2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers Qi Tang
2026-04-01 14:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox