* [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions
@ 2026-04-17 8:33 Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 8:33 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: ensure typedef are deduplicated in split BTF Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 22:10 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Alan Maguire
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Tenart @ 2026-04-17 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrii, eddyz87; +Cc: Antoine Tenart, bpf, Paul Houssel, Alan Maguire
When deduplicating definitions for a module, typedef defined in the base
are not removed. This is because the hash used for base types differs
from the one used in the deduplication logic in btf_dedup_struct_type.
This was introduced by the referenced commit when moving the typedef
deduplication logic handling from btf_dedup_ref_type to
btf_dedup_struct_type, as this also changed the hash logic
(btf_hash_common to btf_hash_typedef).
This also impacts other types referencing those typedef (e.g. const). In
my test, the BTF section size of the openvswitch module went from 31KB
to 45KB.
Cc: Paul Houssel <paulhoussel2@gmail.com>
Fixes: 3781413465df ("libbpf: Fix BTF dedup to support recursive typedef definitions").
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index ceb57b46a878..771aeaa0262b 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4578,12 +4578,14 @@ static int btf_dedup_prep(struct btf_dedup *d)
case BTF_KIND_RESTRICT:
case BTF_KIND_PTR:
case BTF_KIND_FWD:
- case BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF:
case BTF_KIND_FUNC:
case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
case BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG:
h = btf_hash_common(t);
break;
+ case BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF:
+ h = btf_hash_typedef(t);
+ break;
case BTF_KIND_INT:
case BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG:
h = btf_hash_int_decl_tag(t);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: ensure typedef are deduplicated in split BTF
2026-04-17 8:33 [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Antoine Tenart
@ 2026-04-17 8:33 ` Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 22:10 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Alan Maguire
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Tenart @ 2026-04-17 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrii, eddyz87; +Cc: Antoine Tenart, bpf, Alan Maguire
If a typedef is defined both in a base and in a split BTF, after
deduplication a single instance should be found in the base BTF.
Suggested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
---
Since v1:
- Added this patch.
.../bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c | 48 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
index 5bc15bb6b7ce..0db7707ae90d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
@@ -20,18 +20,22 @@ static void test_split_simple() {
btf__add_struct(btf1, "s1", 4); /* [3] struct s1 { */
btf__add_field(btf1, "f1", 1, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
/* } */
+ btf__add_typedef(btf1, "t1", 1); /* [4] typedef int */
VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
btf1,
"[1] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
"[2] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1",
"[3] STRUCT 's1' size=4 vlen=1\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[4] TYPEDEF 't1' type_id=1");
ASSERT_STREQ(btf_type_c_dump(btf1), "\
struct s1 {\n\
int f1;\n\
-};\n\n", "c_dump");
+};\n\
+\n\
+typedef int t1;\n\n", "c_dump");
btf2 = btf__new_empty_split(btf1);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf2, "empty_split_btf"))
@@ -49,39 +53,46 @@ struct s1 {\n\
ASSERT_EQ(btf_is_int(t), true, "int_kind");
ASSERT_STREQ(btf__str_by_offset(btf2, t->name_off), "int", "int_name");
- btf__add_struct(btf2, "s2", 16); /* [4] struct s2 { */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 6, 0, 0); /* struct s1 f1; */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 5, 32, 0); /* int f2; */
+ btf__add_struct(btf2, "s2", 16); /* [5] struct s2 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 7, 0, 0); /* struct s1 f1; */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 6, 32, 0); /* int f2; */
btf__add_field(btf2, "f3", 2, 64, 0); /* int *f3; */
/* } */
/* duplicated int */
- btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [5] int */
+ btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [6] int */
/* duplicated struct s1 */
- btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 4); /* [6] struct s1 { */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 5, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
+ btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 4); /* [7] struct s1 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 6, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
/* } */
+ /* duplicated typedef t1 */
+ btf__add_typedef(btf2, "t1", 6); /* [8] typedef int */
+
VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
btf2,
"[1] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
"[2] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1",
"[3] STRUCT 's1' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
- "[4] STRUCT 's2' size=16 vlen=3\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=6 bits_offset=0\n"
- "\t'f2' type_id=5 bits_offset=32\n"
+ "[4] TYPEDEF 't1' type_id=1",
+ "[5] STRUCT 's2' size=16 vlen=3\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=7 bits_offset=0\n"
+ "\t'f2' type_id=6 bits_offset=32\n"
"\t'f3' type_id=2 bits_offset=64",
- "[5] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
- "[6] STRUCT 's1' size=4 vlen=1\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=5 bits_offset=0");
+ "[6] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
+ "[7] STRUCT 's1' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=6 bits_offset=0",
+ "[8] TYPEDEF 't1' type_id=6");
ASSERT_STREQ(btf_type_c_dump(btf2), "\
struct s1 {\n\
int f1;\n\
};\n\
\n\
+typedef int t1;\n\
+\n\
struct s1___2 {\n\
int f1;\n\
};\n\
@@ -90,7 +101,9 @@ struct s2 {\n\
struct s1___2 f1;\n\
int f2;\n\
int *f3;\n\
-};\n\n", "c_dump");
+};\n\
+\n\
+typedef int t1___2;\n\n", "c_dump");
err = btf__dedup(btf2, NULL);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf_dedup"))
@@ -102,7 +115,8 @@ struct s2 {\n\
"[2] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1",
"[3] STRUCT 's1' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
- "[4] STRUCT 's2' size=16 vlen=3\n"
+ "[4] TYPEDEF 't1' type_id=1",
+ "[5] STRUCT 's2' size=16 vlen=3\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=3 bits_offset=0\n"
"\t'f2' type_id=1 bits_offset=32\n"
"\t'f3' type_id=2 bits_offset=64");
@@ -112,6 +126,8 @@ struct s1 {\n\
int f1;\n\
};\n\
\n\
+typedef int t1;\n\
+\n\
struct s2 {\n\
struct s1 f1;\n\
int f2;\n\
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions
2026-04-17 8:33 [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 8:33 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: ensure typedef are deduplicated in split BTF Antoine Tenart
@ 2026-04-17 22:10 ` Alan Maguire
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Maguire @ 2026-04-17 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antoine Tenart, andrii, eddyz87; +Cc: bpf, Paul Houssel
On 17/04/2026 09:33, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> When deduplicating definitions for a module, typedef defined in the base
> are not removed. This is because the hash used for base types differs
> from the one used in the deduplication logic in btf_dedup_struct_type.
>
> This was introduced by the referenced commit when moving the typedef
> deduplication logic handling from btf_dedup_ref_type to
> btf_dedup_struct_type, as this also changed the hash logic
> (btf_hash_common to btf_hash_typedef).
>
> This also impacts other types referencing those typedef (e.g. const). In
> my test, the BTF section size of the openvswitch module went from 31KB
> to 45KB.
>
> Cc: Paul Houssel <paulhoussel2@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 3781413465df ("libbpf: Fix BTF dedup to support recursive typedef definitions").
> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
Thanks; verified that this patch resolves issues with duplicated typedefs
in modules. Selftest in patch 2 fails prior to this patch, and succeeds after
it is applied. So for the series
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index ceb57b46a878..771aeaa0262b 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -4578,12 +4578,14 @@ static int btf_dedup_prep(struct btf_dedup *d)
> case BTF_KIND_RESTRICT:
> case BTF_KIND_PTR:
> case BTF_KIND_FWD:
> - case BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF:
> case BTF_KIND_FUNC:
> case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
> case BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG:
> h = btf_hash_common(t);
> break;
> + case BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF:
> + h = btf_hash_typedef(t);
> + break;
> case BTF_KIND_INT:
> case BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG:
> h = btf_hash_int_decl_tag(t);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-17 22:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-17 8:33 [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 8:33 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: ensure typedef are deduplicated in split BTF Antoine Tenart
2026-04-17 22:10 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] libbpf: fix deduplication of typedef with base definitions Alan Maguire
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox