public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf, netkit: reject offloaded programs on attach
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:37:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424033752.1F76BC19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423033609.252464-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] The patch prevents attaching offloaded programs during link creation and program attach, but fails to secure the link update path, allowing a complete bypass of the fix.
--

commit 4b4a6a3785c138df3a0a76f92652aa68a0ea77d6
Author: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

bpf, netkit: reject offloaded programs on attach

This commit rejects offloaded BPF programs in netkit_prog_attach() and
netkit_link_attach() to prevent them from triggering a WARN in
bpf_prog_warn_on_exec() when executed on the software path.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/netkit.c b/drivers/net/netkit.c
> index 7b56a7ad7a496..d845a24c5915d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netkit.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netkit.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1000,6 +1003,9 @@ int netkit_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	struct net_device *dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (bpf_prog_is_offloaded(prog->aux))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

Is it also necessary to reject offloaded programs in netkit_link_update()?

It looks like a user could bypass this fix by creating a netkit link with a
non-offloaded program, and then using BPF_LINK_UPDATE to replace it with an
offloaded program.

The netkit_link_update() callback directly passes the new program to
bpf_mprog_attach() without checking bpf_prog_is_offloaded():

static int netkit_link_update(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_prog *nprog,
			      struct bpf_prog *oprog)
{
	...
	ret = bpf_mprog_attach(entry, &entry_new, nprog, link, oprog,
			       BPF_F_REPLACE | BPF_F_ID,
			       link->prog->aux->id, 0);
	...
}

Note that tcx_link_update() in the earlier tcx fix appears to suffer from
the exact same omission.

>  	rtnl_lock();
>  	dev = netkit_dev_fetch(current->nsproxy->net_ns,
>  			       attr->link_create.target_ifindex,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260423033609.252464-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23  3:36 [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: prevent offloaded programs from running on host via tcx/netkit Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-23  3:36 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, tcx: reject offloaded programs on attach Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-24  6:53     ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-23  3:36 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf, netkit: " Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24  3:37   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-24  6:53     ` Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260424033752.1F76BC19425@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox