From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 01/29] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_count function
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:26:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603112630.3D1EB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603110554.29590-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The generic ftrace_hash_count() API is incorrectly guarded by CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS, returning a false 0 when direct calls are disabled.
--
commit 61129b2eed8ea43ed2c045ef25d031a4504c8af4
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_count function
Adds an external ftrace_hash_count function to allow retrieving the hash
count from outside the ftrace object.
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 28b30c6f10314..02c24bf766ced 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ int update_ftrace_direct_mod(struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_hash *hash, b
>
> void ftrace_stub_direct_tramp(void);
>
> +unsigned long ftrace_hash_count(struct ftrace_hash *hash);
> +
> #else
> struct ftrace_ops;
> static inline unsigned long ftrace_find_rec_direct(unsigned long ip)
> @@ -590,6 +592,11 @@ static inline int update_ftrace_direct_mod(struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long ftrace_hash_count(struct ftrace_hash *hash)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Is it intended to restrict this generic API to configurations where direct
calls are enabled?
It appears this declaration and the inline dummy are placed inside the
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS block.
When CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE is enabled but direct calls are disabled, any
external caller will silently receive 0. Could this cause subtle logic
errors for users of this generic ftrace infrastructure?
> /*
> * This must be implemented by the architecture.
> * It is the way the ftrace direct_ops helper, when called
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index b2611de3f5943..57ab01fd00bda 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6288,11 +6288,16 @@ int modify_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(modify_ftrace_direct);
>
> -static unsigned long hash_count(struct ftrace_hash *hash)
> +static inline unsigned long hash_count(struct ftrace_hash *hash)
> {
> return hash ? hash->count : 0;
> }
>
> +unsigned long ftrace_hash_count(struct ftrace_hash *hash)
> +{
> + return hash_count(hash);
> +}
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, does this implementation need to be moved outside the direct
calls block so it is broadly available to dynamic ftrace?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603110554.29590-2-jolsa@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 11:05 [PATCHv7 bpf-next 00/29] bpf: tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 01/29] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_count function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 7:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 02/29] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_remove function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 03/29] ftrace: Add add_ftrace_hash_entry function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 04/29] bpf: Use mutex lock pool for bpf trampolines Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 7:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 05/29] bpf: Add struct bpf_trampoline_ops object Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 06/29] bpf: Move trampoline image setup into bpf_trampoline_ops callbacks Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 07/29] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_add/remove_prog functions Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 08/29] bpf: Add struct bpf_tramp_node object Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 09/29] bpf: Factor fsession link to use struct bpf_tramp_node Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 10/29] bpf: Add multi tracing attach types Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 8:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 11/29] bpf: Move sleepable verification code to btf_id_allow_sleepable Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 12/29] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 13/29] bpf: Add support for tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 8:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 8:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 14/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link cookies Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 15/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link session Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 16/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link fdinfo Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 17/29] libbpf: Add bpf_object_cleanup_btf function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 18/29] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 7:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 19/29] libbpf: Add btf_type_is_traceable_func function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 7:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 20/29] libbpf: Add support to create tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 21/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids attach tests Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 13:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 8:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 22/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids module " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 23/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi intersect tests Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 24/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi cookies test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 25/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi session test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 26/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach fails test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 27/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi verifier " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 28/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach benchmark test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 29/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach rollback tests Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603112630.3D1EB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox