BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 13/29] bpf: Add support for tracing multi link
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:41:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603114150.AB61C1F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603110554.29590-14-jolsa@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch references multiple undefined symbols (`struct bpf_tracing_multi_link`, `bpf_trampoline_multi_attach`, `bpf_trampoline_multi_detach`, and `is_tracing_multi`), which results in compilation failures.
--

commit 4e3377b79034e4eafa802e1a2382a4ca893a956f
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

bpf: Add support for tracing multi link

This commit adds a new link type to allow attaching a BPF program to
multiple function BTF IDs. It introduces the tracing_multi configuration
fields in bpf_attr::link_create and implements the attachment logic.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 625a4366fe6d7..6f72ede0c8f04 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -5842,6 +5842,8 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
>  			ret = bpf_iter_link_attach(attr, uattr, prog);
>  		else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
>  			ret = cgroup_bpf_link_attach(attr, prog);
> +		else if (is_tracing_multi(prog->expected_attach_type))

[Severity: Low]
Is is_tracing_multi() defined anywhere in this series? It appears this might
cause an implicit declaration error during the build, as the function or macro
seems to be missing.

> +			ret = bpf_tracing_multi_attach(prog, attr);
>  		else
>  			ret = bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog,

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index d853f97bd154f..9e3cb547651e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -3641,3 +3642,132 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr(const struct bpf_dynptr *dptr
>  }
>  
>  __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS) && \
> +    defined(CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS)
> +
> +static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *tr_link =
> +		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link, link);
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(link->prog, tr_link));

[Severity: Low]
Where is bpf_trampoline_multi_detach() declared? It looks like the declaration
and definition for this function are missing, which will break the build.

> +}

[ ... ]

> +int bpf_tracing_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link = NULL;
> +	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
> +	u32 cnt, *ids = NULL;

[ ... ]

> +	err = check_dup_ids(ids, cnt);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	link = kvzalloc_flex(*link, nodes, cnt);

[Severity: Low]
Is struct bpf_tracing_multi_link defined anywhere? Evaluating the size of an
incomplete type in this allocation macro will lead to a compiler error.

> +	if (!link) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto error;
> +	}

[ ... ]

> +	link->nodes_cnt = cnt;
> +
> +	err = bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(prog, ids, link);

[Severity: Low]
Does bpf_trampoline_multi_attach() exist yet? Like the detach function, this
seems to be undeclared and undefined, leading to a build failure.

> +	kvfree(ids);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603110554.29590-14-jolsa@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-03 11:05 [PATCHv7 bpf-next 00/29] bpf: tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 01/29] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_count function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  7:59     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 02/29] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_remove function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 03/29] ftrace: Add add_ftrace_hash_entry function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 04/29] bpf: Use mutex lock pool for bpf trampolines Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  7:59     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 05/29] bpf: Add struct bpf_trampoline_ops object Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 06/29] bpf: Move trampoline image setup into bpf_trampoline_ops callbacks Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 07/29] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_add/remove_prog functions Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 08/29] bpf: Add struct bpf_tramp_node object Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 09/29] bpf: Factor fsession link to use struct bpf_tramp_node Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 10/29] bpf: Add multi tracing attach types Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  8:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 11/29] bpf: Move sleepable verification code to btf_id_allow_sleepable Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 12/29] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 13/29] bpf: Add support for tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:41   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04  8:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:52   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04  8:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 14/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link cookies Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 15/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link session Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 16/29] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link fdinfo Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 17/29] libbpf: Add bpf_object_cleanup_btf function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 18/29] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  7:59     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 19/29] libbpf: Add btf_type_is_traceable_func function Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  7:59     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 20/29] libbpf: Add support to create tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 21/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids attach tests Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 13:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  8:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 22/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids module " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 23/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi intersect tests Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 24/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi cookies test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 25/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi session test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 26/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach fails test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 27/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi verifier " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 28/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach benchmark test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-03 11:05 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 29/29] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach rollback tests Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260603114150.AB61C1F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox