From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/18] selftests/bpf: Test __szk precision with a NULL nullable buffer
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:46:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260801074633.1595644-12-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260801074633.1595644-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
When a nullable buffer is passed as NULL, check_mem_size_reg() is skipped,
so the __szk memory size must be marked precise through the scalar argument
path instead. Exercise this with bpf_dynptr_slice() and a NULL buffer.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 ++
.../bpf/progs/verifier_mem_size_reg.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_size_reg.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 41cd071d016a..b79bafca68f7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
#include "verifier_masking.skel.h"
#include "verifier_may_goto_1.skel.h"
#include "verifier_may_goto_2.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_mem_size_reg.skel.h"
#include "verifier_meta_access.skel.h"
#include "verifier_movsx.skel.h"
#include "verifier_mtu.skel.h"
@@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ void test_verifier_map_ret_val(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ret_val); }
void test_verifier_masking(void) { RUN(verifier_masking); }
void test_verifier_may_goto_1(void) { RUN(verifier_may_goto_1); }
void test_verifier_may_goto_2(void) { RUN(verifier_may_goto_2); }
+void test_verifier_mem_size_reg(void) { RUN(verifier_mem_size_reg); }
void test_verifier_meta_access(void) { RUN(verifier_meta_access); }
void test_verifier_movsx(void) { RUN(verifier_movsx); }
void test_verifier_mul(void) { RUN(verifier_mul); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_size_reg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_size_reg.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7e24706a764e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_size_reg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/*
+ * The __szk size of a kfunc memory/size pair must be marked precise even when
+ * the nullable buffer is passed as NULL.
+ */
+SEC("?tc")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack= before")
+int dynptr_slice_null_buf_size_precise(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr dptr;
+ char *p;
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &dptr);
+
+ p = bpf_dynptr_slice(&dptr, 0, NULL, 8);
+ if (p)
+ return p[0];
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 7:46 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/18] Generate bpf_func_proto for kfunc Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/18] bpf: Drop process_timer_func wrappers Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/18] bpf: Unify const map ptr argument checking for helpers and kfuncs Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/18] bpf: Split kfunc map argument into __const_map and __map Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/18] bpf: Pass kfunc meta to mem and mem_size check Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/18] bpf: Resolve map lookup result type at lookup time Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/18] bpf: Check helper and kfunc mem+size arguments identically Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/18] selftests/bpf: Test map lookup result refinement Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/18] bpf: Check fixed-size mem args of helpers and kfuncs the same way Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/18] bpf: Rename ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} to ARG_MEM_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/18] bpf: Fold __szk const size handling into the scalar arg path Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/18] bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/18] bpf: Handle NULL kfunc pointer args without a KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL type Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/18] bpf: Distinguish fixed- and variable-size kfunc mem args with MEM_FIXED_SIZE Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/18] bpf: Classify kfunc pointer arguments from BTF, resolve type against the register Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/18] bpf: Tag nullable kfunc pointer args with PTR_MAYBE_NULL Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/18] bpf: Classify scalar kfunc arguments from BTF Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/18] bpf: Generate kfunc argument prototype at add-call time Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260801074633.1595644-12-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox