From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/18] selftests/bpf: Test map lookup result refinement
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260801074633.1595644-8-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260801074633.1595644-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
A map-of-maps lookup value is refined to a map pointer (map_ptr_or_null)
at lookup time by refine_map_lookup_value(). Test that it is rejected
wherever a raw map value would be read as bytes, so the inner map
descriptor cannot leak.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../bpf/progs/verifier_map_lookup_refine.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_lookup_refine.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index be97f6887f0e..41cd071d016a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
#include "verifier_loops1.skel.h"
#include "verifier_lwt.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_in_map.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_map_lookup_refine.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_ptr_mixing.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_ret_val.skel.h"
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ void test_verifier_liveness_exp(void) { RUN(verifier_liveness_exp); }
void test_verifier_loops1(void) { RUN(verifier_loops1); }
void test_verifier_lwt(void) { RUN(verifier_lwt); }
void test_verifier_map_in_map(void) { RUN(verifier_map_in_map); }
+void test_verifier_map_lookup_refine(void) { RUN(verifier_map_lookup_refine); }
void test_verifier_map_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ptr); }
void test_verifier_map_ptr_mixing(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ptr_mixing); }
void test_verifier_map_ret_val(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ret_val); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_lookup_refine.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_lookup_refine.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c01abf54923d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_lookup_refine.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct inner_map {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, int);
+} inner_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __array(values, struct inner_map);
+} outer_map SEC(".maps") = {
+ .values = { [0] = &inner_map },
+};
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("type=map_ptr_or_null expected=fp")
+int mapofmaps_value_as_kfunc_mem_buf(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr dptr;
+ __u32 key = 0;
+ void *inner;
+ char *p;
+
+ inner = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_map, &key);
+ /* intentionally NOT NULL-checked: type is map_ptr_or_null */
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &dptr);
+ /* arg3 is mem+size */
+ p = bpf_dynptr_slice(&dptr, 0, inner, 4);
+ if (p)
+ return p[0];
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("type=map_ptr_or_null expected=fp")
+int mapofmaps_value_as_helper_mem_buf(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u32 key = 0;
+ void *inner;
+
+ inner = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_map, &key);
+ /* intentionally NOT NULL-checked: type is map_ptr_or_null */
+
+ /* arg1 is mem+size */
+ return bpf_csum_diff(inner, 4, NULL, 0, 0) + skb->len;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("type=map_ptr_or_null expected=fp")
+int mapofmaps_value_as_helper_fixed_mem(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ char th[sizeof(struct tcphdr)] = {};
+ __u32 key = 0;
+ void *inner;
+
+ inner = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_map, &key);
+ /* intentionally NOT NULL-checked: type is map_ptr_or_null */
+
+ /* arg1 is fixed-sized mem */
+ return bpf_tcp_raw_check_syncookie_ipv4(inner, (void *)th);
+}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 7:46 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/18] Generate bpf_func_proto for kfunc Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/18] bpf: Drop process_timer_func wrappers Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/18] bpf: Unify const map ptr argument checking for helpers and kfuncs Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/18] bpf: Split kfunc map argument into __const_map and __map Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/18] bpf: Pass kfunc meta to mem and mem_size check Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/18] bpf: Resolve map lookup result type at lookup time Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/18] bpf: Check helper and kfunc mem+size arguments identically Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/18] bpf: Check fixed-size mem args of helpers and kfuncs the same way Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/18] bpf: Rename ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} to ARG_MEM_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/18] bpf: Fold __szk const size handling into the scalar arg path Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/18] selftests/bpf: Test __szk precision with a NULL nullable buffer Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/18] bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/18] bpf: Handle NULL kfunc pointer args without a KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL type Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/18] bpf: Distinguish fixed- and variable-size kfunc mem args with MEM_FIXED_SIZE Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/18] bpf: Classify kfunc pointer arguments from BTF, resolve type against the register Amery Hung
2026-08-01 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/18] bpf: Tag nullable kfunc pointer args with PTR_MAYBE_NULL Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/18] bpf: Classify scalar kfunc arguments from BTF Amery Hung
2026-08-01 7:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/18] bpf: Generate kfunc argument prototype at add-call time Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260801074633.1595644-8-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox