* [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination
@ 2026-08-12 23:15 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-12 23:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 0:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2026-08-12 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Sashiko, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
Eduard Zingerman, Emil Tsalapatis, kkd, kernel-team
The verifier keeps per-subprogram metadata in three parallel arrays:
subprog_info, func_info, and func_info_aux. Dead code elimination can
remove whole subprograms, and adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove()
shifts subprog_info and func_info to close the gap, but leaves
func_info_aux in place. From that point on, func_info_aux[i] no longer
describes subprogram i.
Shift func_info_aux together with func_info so the three arrays stay
aligned after subprogram removal.
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260808064523.DE3E71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/fixups.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
index c4bd70befbb5..37ea85e974f1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
@@ -401,13 +401,17 @@ static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
sizeof(*env->subprog_info) * move);
env->subprog_cnt -= j - i;
- /* remove func_info */
+ /* remove func_info and its aux */
if (aux->func_info) {
move = aux->func_info_cnt - j;
memmove(aux->func_info + i,
aux->func_info + j,
sizeof(*aux->func_info) * move);
+ if (aux->func_info_aux)
+ memmove(aux->func_info_aux + i,
+ aux->func_info_aux + j,
+ sizeof(*aux->func_info_aux) * move);
aux->func_info_cnt -= j - i;
/* func_info->insn_off is set after all code rewrites,
* in adjust_btf_func() - no need to adjust
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination
2026-08-12 23:15 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2026-08-12 23:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 0:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-12 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi; +Cc: bpf
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Failure to update `env->exception_callback_subprog` during dead code elimination leads to an out-of-bounds array read and potential crash during JIT.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination ---
commit f1d27d196a7979de10f6e09614e6262cf8069cae
Author: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination
The commit shifts func_info_aux together with func_info so the three parallel
arrays stay aligned after subprogram removal during dead code elimination.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260808064523.DE3E71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> index c4bd70befbb5c..37ea85e974f14 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> @@ -401,13 +401,17 @@ static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> sizeof(*env->subprog_info) * move);
> env->subprog_cnt -= j - i;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but should we also be adjusting
env->exception_callback_subprog here?
When dead code elimination removes an unused static function that comes before
an exception callback, env->subprog_cnt is decremented and subprograms are
shifted down. However, env->exception_callback_subprog is left unadjusted.
Later, in jit_subprogs(), the func array is allocated with the new, smaller
env->subprog_cnt. Accessing it using the outdated
env->exception_callback_subprog index could result in an out-of-bounds array
read and a potential kernel panic:
kernel/bpf/fixups.c:jit_subprogs() {
...
prog->aux->bpf_exception_cb = (void *)func[env->exception_callback_subprog]->bpf_func;
...
}
Does env->exception_callback_subprog need to be updated to reflect the shift
when subprograms are removed?
>
> - /* remove func_info */
> + /* remove func_info and its aux */
> if (aux->func_info) {
> move = aux->func_info_cnt - j;
>
> memmove(aux->func_info + i,
> aux->func_info + j,
> sizeof(*aux->func_info) * move);
> + if (aux->func_info_aux)
> + memmove(aux->func_info_aux + i,
> + aux->func_info_aux + j,
> + sizeof(*aux->func_info_aux) * move);
> aux->func_info_cnt -= j - i;
> /* func_info->insn_off is set after all code rewrites,
> * in adjust_btf_func() - no need to adjust
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812231506.3558128-1-memxor@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination
2026-08-12 23:15 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-12 23:29 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-13 0:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-08-13 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: memxor, bpf
Cc: sashiko-bot, ast, andrii, daniel, eddyz87, emil, kkd, kernel-team,
ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, clm,
ihor.solodrai
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1185 bytes --]
> bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination
>
> The verifier keeps per-subprogram metadata in three parallel arrays:
> subprog_info, func_info, and func_info_aux. Dead code elimination can
> remove whole subprograms, and adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove()
> shifts subprog_info and func_info to close the gap, but leaves
> func_info_aux in place. From that point on, func_info_aux[i] no longer
> describes subprogram i.
>
> Shift func_info_aux together with func_info so the three arrays stay
> aligned after subprogram removal.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260808064523.DE3E71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
This looks like a bug fix for func_info_aux array alignment. Should this
include:
Fixes: 51c39bb1d5d1 ("bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification")
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31651414371
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-13 0:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-12 23:15 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code elimination Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-12 23:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 0:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox