From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext survival across veth and GRE
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:14:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815081453.5BC451F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814-bpf-meta-inside-skb-ext-v1-6-767edd862656@cloudflare.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incorrect assertions for if_nametoindex() return values allow errors to pass silently.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH net-next 06/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext survival across veth and GRE ---
commit 9eef2d71b261cfaa465a5233213fb272dc34f416
Author: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext survival across veth and GRE
This commit tests if skb_ext survives veth cross-netns forwarding and GRE
encap/decap. It writes skb_ext at TC egress and reads it back at TC ingress
after the packet crosses device boundaries.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
> index 58b793cf14e59..de60303025361 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -783,6 +783,156 @@ static void test_mirred_clone_ext_cow(struct test_xdp_meta *skel)
> +/* Test if skb_ext survives veth cross-netns forward */
> +static void test_skb_ext_scrub_veth(struct test_xdp_meta *skel)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + SYS(close, "ip link set dev " RX_NAME " up");
> +
> + rx_ifindex = if_nametoindex(RX_NAME);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(rx_ifindex, 0, "if_nametoindex rx"))
> + goto close;
[Severity: Low]
Does this code correctly catch interface lookup failures?
Since if_nametoindex() returns 0 on failure, the ASSERT_GE(rx_ifindex, 0, ...)
check will evaluate 0 >= 0 as true, failing to catch the error. The test will
instead fail slightly later with a less descriptive error.
Should this be using ASSERT_GT() or ASSERT_NEQ() instead?
[ ... ]
> + SYS(close, "ip link set dev " TX_NAME " up");
> +
> + tx_ifindex = if_nametoindex(TX_NAME);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(tx_ifindex, 0, "if_nametoindex tx"))
> + goto close;
[Severity: Low]
Is this the same issue here? if_nametoindex() returning 0 would bypass this
ASSERT_GE check.
[ ... ]
> +/* Test if skb_ext survives GRE tunnel encap+decap */
> +static void test_skb_ext_scrub_gre(struct test_xdp_meta *skel)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* Write skb_ext on TC egress on GRE tx */
> + tx_ifindex = if_nametoindex("gre_tx");
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(tx_ifindex, 0, "tx_ifindex"))
> + goto close;
[Severity: Low]
Is this the same issue here as well?
[ ... ]
> + /* Read skb_ext on TC ingress on GRE rx */
> + rx_ifindex = if_nametoindex("gre_rx");
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(rx_ifindex, 0, "rx_ifindex"))
> + goto close;
[Severity: Low]
And one more instance here where ASSERT_GE allows if_nametoindex() failure
to pass silently.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814-bpf-meta-inside-skb-ext-v1-0-767edd862656@cloudflare.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 8:14 [PATCH net-next 00/14] skb extension for BPF metadata Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] bpf: Introduce per-packet metadata storage for BPF programs Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] bpf: Allow access to bpf_sock_ops_kern->skb Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] bpf: Make BPF skb extension survive packet scrubbing Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_dynptr_from_skb_ext Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext on cloned skbs Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext survival across veth and GRE Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from cgroup_skb and sk_filter hooks Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from sock_ops and LSM hooks Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from kfree_skb tracepoint Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from netfilter hook Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext from LWT in, out, and xmit hooks Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from seg6local End.BPF hook Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] selftests/bpf: Test skb_ext read from sk_skb stream verdict hook Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 8:14 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] selftests/bpf: Use non-trivial test payload in xdp_context tests Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815081453.5BC451F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox