From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ziyang Men" <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] cgroup: add BPF kfuncs to read a cpu cgroup's stats
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 21:28:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820212840.AD15E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820211758.3393984-2-ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `bpf_cgroup_base_stat` kfunc is exposed to all BPF program types but unsafely acquires a non-NMI-safe lock and unconditionally enables hardware interrupts, leading to IRQ state corruption, NMI deadlocks, and PREEMPT_RT panics.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/4] cgroup: add BPF kfuncs to read a cpu cgroup's stats ---
commit 41558082c4ece37f910c5109f3537477a7ba8820
Author: Ziyang Men <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
cgroup: add BPF kfuncs to read a cpu cgroup's stats
This commit adds BPF kfuncs for reading CPU cgroup statistics. It registers
css_rstat_flush() and bpf_cgroup_base_stat(), allowing BPF programs to read
CFS bandwidth counters directly.
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> index de816a43db9f0..5db72504a8a5a 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -752,10 +752,49 @@ void cgroup_base_stat_cputime_show(struct seq_file *seq)
> cgroup_force_idle_show(seq, &bstat);
> }
>
> -/* Add bpf kfuncs for css_rstat_updated() and css_rstat_flush() */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> +
> +/**
> + * bpf_cgroup_base_stat - Read a cgroup's base statistics
> + * @cgrp: cgroup to read from
> + * @out: zero-initialized output in nanoseconds
> + *
> + * CPU time is adjusted as for cpu.stat.
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_cgroup_base_stat(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> + struct cgroup_base_stat *out)
> +{
> + if (cgroup_parent(cgrp)) {
> + __css_rstat_lock(&cgrp->self, -1);
> + *out = cgrp->bstat;
> + cputime_adjust(&cgrp->bstat.cputime, &cgrp->prev_cputime,
> + &out->cputime.utime, &out->cputime.stime);
> + __css_rstat_unlock(&cgrp->self, -1);
[Severity: High]
Does this code unconditionally enable hardware interrupts when called from
arbitrary BPF contexts?
Since this kfunc is registered under BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC without context
checks, it can be called from tracing programs (like kprobes or perf_events)
that may run in NMI context or with interrupts already disabled.
If it executes in an interrupt-disabled context, __css_rstat_unlock() will
unconditionally re-enable hardware interrupts and violate the caller's locking
assumptions:
kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:__css_rstat_unlock() {
...
spin_unlock_irq(lock);
}
Also, could calling this from an atomic tracing context cause a panic on
PREEMPT_RT, since spinlock_t is a sleeping lock there?
> + } else {
> + root_cgroup_cputime(out);
> + }
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820211758.3393984-1-ziyang.meme@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 21:17 [PATCH v3 0/4] cgroup: expose cpu.stat and io.stat to BPF Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] cgroup: add BPF kfuncs to read a cpu cgroup's stats Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] selftests/bpf: add cgroup_iter_cpu test for cpu cgroup kfuncs Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 22:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] block: add BPF kfuncs to read blkcg io.stat Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: add test for blkcg io.stat BPF kfuncs Ziyang Men
2026-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] cgroup: expose cpu.stat and io.stat to BPF Ziyang Men
2026-09-02 23:10 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-03 22:33 ` Ziyang Men
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820212840.AD15E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ziyang.meme@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox