From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ziyang Men" <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] block: add BPF kfuncs to read blkcg io.stat
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 21:40:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820214041.C19601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820211758.3393984-4-ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Calling bpf_css_release() from NMI context can trigger a deadlock.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/4] block: add BPF kfuncs to read blkcg io.stat ---
commit d71e52907eeb75ca126ab0da4391bc18134b90e2
Author: Ziyang Men <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
block: add BPF kfuncs to read blkcg io.stat
This commit adds BPF kfuncs to acquire and release a controller's css from a
cgroup. It also adds a kfunc to cast an io controller css to its block
cgroup, along with an open-coded iterator for the per-device blkgs.
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/bpf_cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/bpf_cgroup.c
> index cd28c838dc7b6..e253633e82782 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/bpf_cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/bpf_cgroup.c
[ ... ]
> +/**
> + * bpf_css_release - Release a css reference
> + * @css: css to release
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_css_release(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> +{
> + css_put(css);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can this trigger a deadlock if called from NMI context?
Since these kfuncs are registered under BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, they can be
called by NMI-context BPF programs such as perf events.
If a BPF program drops the last reference to the css here, css_put() will
invoke the percpu_ref release callback, css_release(), directly in the NMI
context.
css_release() unconditionally calls queue_work(), which internally acquires
the workqueue pool's raw spinlock. If the NMI interrupted a context that
already held this lock, would this instantly deadlock the system?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820211758.3393984-1-ziyang.meme@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 21:17 [PATCH v3 0/4] cgroup: expose cpu.stat and io.stat to BPF Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] cgroup: add BPF kfuncs to read a cpu cgroup's stats Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] selftests/bpf: add cgroup_iter_cpu test for cpu cgroup kfuncs Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 22:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] block: add BPF kfuncs to read blkcg io.stat Ziyang Men
2026-08-20 21:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 22:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-20 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: add test for blkcg io.stat BPF kfuncs Ziyang Men
2026-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] cgroup: expose cpu.stat and io.stat to BPF Ziyang Men
2026-09-02 23:10 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820214041.C19601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ziyang.meme@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox