From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Record each half of a paired return value in verifier diagnostics
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:49:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824144943.991316-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
A subprogram returning more than 8 bytes comes back in the R0:R2 register
pair, and prepare_func_exit() copies both registers into the caller. The
diagnostic modification scope around that copy names only R0, so the write
into R2 is never recorded.
Fix it by opening a diagnostic modification scope for each return register.
This way, both return registers are recorded.
Fixes: 0630ad00d96d ("bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0: R2")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index e036ae20bf6b..9aa29c367008 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10403,10 +10403,14 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
* return to the caller whatever the callee had in the
* return register(s)
*/
- bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &caller->regs[BPF_REG_0], r0, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
- for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++)
- caller->regs[ret_regs[i]] = callee->regs[ret_regs[i]];
- bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
+ for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
+ u32 regno = ret_regs[i];
+
+ bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &caller->regs[regno], &callee->regs[regno],
+ BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
+ caller->regs[regno] = callee->regs[regno];
+ bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
+ }
}
/* for callbacks like bpf_loop or bpf_for_each_map_elem go back to callsite,
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 14:49 Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-08-24 14:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Report which member makes a kfunc return type unsupported Yonghong Song
2026-08-24 15:35 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 19:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-24 20:44 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-24 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Record each half of a paired return value in verifier diagnostics Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824144943.991316-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox