BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khawar Ahemad <ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:52:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825102215.83662-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825094955.83240-2-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>

Hi,

Thanks for the careful review. After tracing the call path in full,
this finding is a false positive. Here is the evidence:

alloc_pages_nolock() is implemented as alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof()
in mm/page_alloc.c. Regardless of which gfp_flags the caller passes, the
implementation unconditionally ORs in __GFP_ZERO before calling
get_page_from_freelist():

  /* mm/page_alloc.c, alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof() */
  gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_COMP
                  | gfp_flags;

The comment at that exact site makes the intent explicit:

  "Specify __GFP_ZERO to make sure that call to kmsan_alloc_page() below
   is safe in any context. Also zeroing the page is mandatory for
   BPF use cases."

So even though __bpf_alloc_page() passes only __GFP_ACCOUNT to
alloc_pages_nolock(), the allocator enforces __GFP_ZERO unconditionally.
The returned page is always zeroed before being handed to the caller.
There is no path through which uninitialized kernel memory can be mapped
into a BPF arena.

The API documentation in include/linux/gfp.h also states that
__GFP_ACCOUNT is the only caller-supplied flag alloc_pages_nolock()
accepts, precisely because the implementation controls all others itself.

No code change is needed.

Khawar Ahemad <ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  9:49 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: arena: handle memory.max on fault-in with reclaim/OOM Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25  9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:22   ` Khawar Ahemad [this message]
2026-08-25 10:32   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25  9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/4] bpf: arena: allocate the fault-in page outside the lock Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:32   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25  9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add read_cgroup_file() to cgroup_helpers Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25  9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a test for arena fault-in under memory.max Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:32   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25 10:43   ` Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 11:19     ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-08-25 12:23       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-25 11:28   ` Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25  9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: arena: handle memory.max on fault-in with reclaim/OOM Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260825102215.83662-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com \
    --to=ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox