From: Khawar Ahemad <ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:52:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825102215.83662-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825094955.83240-2-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>
Hi,
Thanks for the careful review. After tracing the call path in full,
this finding is a false positive. Here is the evidence:
alloc_pages_nolock() is implemented as alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof()
in mm/page_alloc.c. Regardless of which gfp_flags the caller passes, the
implementation unconditionally ORs in __GFP_ZERO before calling
get_page_from_freelist():
/* mm/page_alloc.c, alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof() */
gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_COMP
| gfp_flags;
The comment at that exact site makes the intent explicit:
"Specify __GFP_ZERO to make sure that call to kmsan_alloc_page() below
is safe in any context. Also zeroing the page is mandatory for
BPF use cases."
So even though __bpf_alloc_page() passes only __GFP_ACCOUNT to
alloc_pages_nolock(), the allocator enforces __GFP_ZERO unconditionally.
The returned page is always zeroed before being handed to the caller.
There is no path through which uninitialized kernel memory can be mapped
into a BPF arena.
The API documentation in include/linux/gfp.h also states that
__GFP_ACCOUNT is the only caller-supplied flag alloc_pages_nolock()
accepts, precisely because the implementation controls all others itself.
No code change is needed.
Khawar Ahemad <ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 9:49 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: arena: handle memory.max on fault-in with reclaim/OOM Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:22 ` Khawar Ahemad [this message]
2026-08-25 10:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25 9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/4] bpf: arena: allocate the fault-in page outside the lock Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25 9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add read_cgroup_file() to cgroup_helpers Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 9:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a test for arena fault-in under memory.max Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 10:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-25 10:43 ` Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 11:19 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-08-25 12:23 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-25 11:28 ` Khawar Ahemad
2026-08-25 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: arena: handle memory.max on fault-in with reclaim/OOM Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825102215.83662-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com \
--to=ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox