* [STABLE REQUEST] bpf: backport de36adca6346 to 7.1.y
@ 2026-08-24 19:00 하태구
2026-08-25 8:25 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: 하태구 @ 2026-08-24 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Hello,
Please consider backporting the following upstream commit to Linux 7.1.y:
de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f
("bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes")
The issue was introduced by:
2cb27158adb3 ("bpf: poison dead stack slots")
which is present in Linux 7.1.
The fix rejects BTF-derived global subprogram argument sizes larger
than S32_MAX. Without the check, the caller-side PTR_TO_STACK
validation can interpret an overlarge size differently from the
callee-side PTR_TO_MEM state, potentially allowing the verifier to
validate accesses outside the actual stack object.
The upstream commit includes a selftest and applies cleanly to the
current linux-7.1.y tree. The fix is present in Linux 7.2 but is not
present in Linux 7.1.10 or the current 7.1 stable queue.
Upstream commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f
Target stable series:
7.1.y
Thank you,
Taegu Ha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [STABLE REQUEST] bpf: backport de36adca6346 to 7.1.y 2026-08-24 19:00 [STABLE REQUEST] bpf: backport de36adca6346 to 7.1.y 하태구 @ 2026-08-25 8:25 ` Greg KH 2026-08-25 14:24 ` [PATCH 7.1.y] bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes Taegu Ha 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-08-25 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 하태구; +Cc: stable, bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 04:00:34AM +0900, 하태구 wrote: > Hello, > > Please consider backporting the following upstream commit to Linux 7.1.y: > > de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f > ("bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes") > > The issue was introduced by: > > 2cb27158adb3 ("bpf: poison dead stack slots") > > which is present in Linux 7.1. > > The fix rejects BTF-derived global subprogram argument sizes larger > than S32_MAX. Without the check, the caller-side PTR_TO_STACK > validation can interpret an overlarge size differently from the > callee-side PTR_TO_MEM state, potentially allowing the verifier to > validate accesses outside the actual stack object. > > The upstream commit includes a selftest and applies cleanly to the > current linux-7.1.y tree. The fix is present in Linux 7.2 but is not > present in Linux 7.1.10 or the current 7.1 stable queue. > > Upstream commit: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f > > Target stable series: > > 7.1.y It does not actually build properly, how did you test this? Please provide a working backport that has been tested if you wish to see this added to the 7.1.y tree. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7.1.y] bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes 2026-08-25 8:25 ` Greg KH @ 2026-08-25 14:24 ` Taegu Ha 2026-08-27 5:17 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Taegu Ha @ 2026-08-25 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, Taegu Ha, Yonghong Song [ Upstream commit de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f ] Global subprogram argument checking derives generic pointer sizes from BTF and passes the resolved size to check_mem_reg() as a u32. The access-size validation path then uses a signed int, and stack pointers negate the value before calling check_helper_mem_access(). This creates a wrap when BTF describes a pointee size larger than S32_MAX. For example, a global subprogram argument of type: int (*p)[0x3fffffff] has a BTF-resolved pointee size of 0xfffffffc bytes. At a call site the caller can pass a pointer to a 4-byte stack slot at fp-4. The current PTR_TO_STACK path computes: size = -(int)mem_size so 0xfffffffc becomes -4 as a signed int and the negation validates only a 4-byte stack range. That range is covered by the caller's stack slot, so the call is accepted. The callee is then verified independently with R1 as PTR_TO_MEM and mem_size 0xfffffffc. A small instruction such as: r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 4) is accepted as being inside that BTF-described memory region. At run time, however, the actual argument value is still fp-4, so r1 + 4 addresses fp+0, outside the 4-byte object that the caller provided. Reject sizes that cannot be represented by the verifier's signed access-size API before the stack-specific negation. Add a verifier regression test for the oversized BTF argument. [ taegu: Backport to 7.1.y: check_mem_reg() still takes a register number and reg_arg_name() is not available. Emit the equivalent R%d diagnostic using regno. The patched v7.1.10 kernel builds and the targeted verifier_global_subprogs/anon_user_mem_huge_size_invalid selftest passes after booting the kernel on x86_64 under QEMU. ] Fixes: 2cb27158adb3 ("bpf: poison dead stack slots") Signed-off-by: Taegu Ha <hataegu0826@gmail.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260528062155.3988156-1-hataegu0826@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++++++ .../bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5bad71f..c4173bf 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -7119,6 +7119,12 @@ static int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg if (bpf_register_is_null(reg)) return 0; + if (mem_size > S32_MAX) { + verbose(env, "R%d memory size %u is too large\n", + regno, mem_size); + return -EACCES; + } + /* Assuming that the register contains a value check if the memory * access is safe. Temporarily save and restore the register's state as * the conversion shouldn't be visible to a caller. diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c index 1e08aff..0ff8f85 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c @@ -151,6 +151,23 @@ int anon_user_mem_valid(void *ctx) return subprog_user_anon_mem(&t); } +__noinline __weak int subprog_user_anon_mem_huge(int (*p)[0x3fffffff]) +{ + return p ? (*p)[1] : 0; +} + +SEC("?tracepoint") +__failure __log_level(2) +__msg("R1 memory size 4294967292 is too large") +int anon_user_mem_huge_size_invalid(void *ctx) +{ + int (*p)[0x3fffffff]; + int tiny = 42; + + p = (void *)&tiny; + return subprog_user_anon_mem_huge(p) + tiny; +} + __noinline __weak int subprog_nonnull_ptr_good(int *p1 __arg_nonnull, int *p2 __arg_nonnull) { return (*p1) * (*p2); /* good, no need for NULL checks */ -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 7.1.y] bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes 2026-08-25 14:24 ` [PATCH 7.1.y] bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes Taegu Ha @ 2026-08-27 5:17 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-08-27 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Sasha Levin, bpf, ast, daniel, Taegu Ha, Yonghong Song > [ Upstream commit de36adca634634c205a9eb8b56a28175ab7abf5f ] > > Global subprogram argument checking derives generic pointer sizes from BTF > and passes the resolved size to check_mem_reg() as a u32. The access-size > validation path then uses a signed int, and stack pointers negate the value > before calling check_helper_mem_access(). Queued for 7.1, thanks. -- Thanks, Sasha ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-27 5:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-08-24 19:00 [STABLE REQUEST] bpf: backport de36adca6346 to 7.1.y 하태구 2026-08-25 8:25 ` Greg KH 2026-08-25 14:24 ` [PATCH 7.1.y] bpf: reject overlarge global subprog argument sizes Taegu Ha 2026-08-27 5:17 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox