From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Geliang Tang" <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:15:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260829021513.5F3491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b840c35fdfdf36e9fddedfa645b12699bc51aa34.1787968065.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditionally skipping tcp_eat_skb() for all self-redirects leaks sequence accounting (copied_seq) for egress redirects, synchronous redirect errors, and psock detach drops.
--
commit 8f3d3d5b6b4f4a55b1a1c00df40c2762471ef372
Author: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting
This commit attempts to fix a double-counting issue in copied_seq when a
BPF stream_verdict program redirects an skb back to the same socket with
BPF_F_INGRESS. It does so by skipping tcp_eat_skb() for self-redirects.
> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> index 2521b643fa05d..5fa7b9639eefe 100644
> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -1039,10 +1039,14 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
[ ... ]
> - case __SK_REDIRECT:
> - tcp_eat_skb(psock->sk, skb);
> + case __SK_REDIRECT: {
> + struct sock *dst = skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb);
> +
> + if (dst != psock->sk)
> + tcp_eat_skb(psock->sk, skb);
> err = sk_psock_skb_redirect(psock, skb);
> break;
> + }
> case __SK_DROP:
[Severity: High]
Does conditionally skipping tcp_eat_skb() here leak sequence accounting
(copied_seq) if the self-redirect encounters an error or is an egress
redirect?
If a BPF program returns SK_REDIRECT to its own socket, tcp_eat_skb() is
bypassed. However, if this is an egress redirect (without BPF_F_INGRESS),
the packet is sent out via skb_send_sock() instead of being read by
tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
Similarly, if sk_psock_skb_redirect() fails synchronously (for example, if
!sk_psock_test_state(psock_other, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED)) and calls
sock_drop(), the packet is also lost.
In both cases, the packet is permanently removed from the ingress path
without advancing copied_seq. Could this cause a permanent sequence
desynchronization that stalls the receive window and triggers a kernel
warning in tcp_recvmsg_locked()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/b840c35fdfdf36e9fddedfa645b12699bc51aa34.1787968065.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-29 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-29 2:00 [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting Geliang Tang
2026-08-29 2:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 11:38 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-09-01 13:00 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-04 14:11 ` Geliang Tang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-04 3:03 netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260829021513.5F3491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox