From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 21:00:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d1e416d-202f-4fcb-85f6-aa380645216f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wlt52od6.fsf@cloudflare.com>
on 9/1/26 7:38 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 10:00 AM +08, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> When a BPF stream_verdict program redirects an skb back to the same
>> socket (self-redirect with BPF_F_INGRESS), sk_psock_verdict_apply()
>> calls tcp_eat_skb() which advances tcp_sk->copied_seq. However, the
>> skb is then delivered to the socket's psock ingress queue and later
>> read by tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), which also advances copied_seq via
Hi Geliang,
tcp_eat_skb() will test 'skb_bpf_strparser(skb)' then skip the
calculation of copied_seq.
>> the copied_from_self accounting path. This double-counting causes
>> copied_seq to advance by 2x the actual data length, triggering:
>>
>> TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied BF2E806, seq BF2E7FD, \
>> rcvnxt BF2E806, fl 0
>> WARNING: net/ipv4/tcp.c:2745 at tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x72b/0x2640
>> Call Trace:
>> tcp_recvmsg+0x10a/0x500
>> sock_recvmsg+0x168/0x1d0
>> __sys_recvfrom+0x19a/0x2a0
>> __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe4/0x1f0
>> do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x530
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>
>> cleanup rbuf bug: copied BF2E806 seq BF2E806 rcvnxt BF2E806
>> WARNING: net/ipv4/tcp.c:1609 at tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0xf2/0x1c0
>> Call Trace:
>> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x8d1/0x2640
>> tcp_recvmsg+0x10a/0x500
>> sock_recvmsg+0x168/0x1d0
>> __sys_recvfrom+0x19a/0x2a0
>> __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe4/0x1f0
>> do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x530
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>
>> Fix this by checking if the redirect destination is the same socket.
>> For self-redirect (dst == psock->sk), skip tcp_eat_skb() since the
>> copied_seq will be advanced when the data is actually read from the
>> ingress queue. For cross-socket redirects, tcp_eat_skb() is still
>> needed to account for data leaving the source socket.
>>
>> Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
>> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encountered this while adding MPTCP BPF sockmap support. The existing
>> TCP sockmap selftests don't cover self-redirect, but the MPTCP tests do,
>> exposing this latent issue.
>>
>> With this fix, both TCP and MPTCP tests pass, validating self-redirect
>> functionality.
>> ---
>> net/core/skmsg.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
>> index 2521b643fa05..5fa7b9639eef 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
>> @@ -1039,10 +1039,14 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> goto out_free;
>> }
>> break;
>> - case __SK_REDIRECT:
>> - tcp_eat_skb(psock->sk, skb);
>> + case __SK_REDIRECT: {
>> + struct sock *dst = skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb);
>> +
>> + if (dst != psock->sk)
>> + tcp_eat_skb(psock->sk, skb);
>> err = sk_psock_skb_redirect(psock, skb);
>> break;
>> + }
>> case __SK_DROP:
>> default:
>> out_free:
> Isn't the source of problem on the read-side (tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser)?
Right, I think I already fixed the parser side.
> We should be advancing copied_seq only for skbs that we received from
> the tcp stack. That's why we have the copied_from_self detection in
> tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser.
>
> I think the problem is that we set msg->sk when we call
> sk_psock_skb_ingress_self from sk_psock_skb_ingress, so on SK_REDIRECT
> path, not the SK_PASS path.
I sucessfully use this selftest to reproduce the splat:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 1fef6ec2ba7a..58a90f2e3602 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -1173,6 +1173,15 @@ static void test_sockmap_copied_seq(bool strp)
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p1)"))
goto end;
+ /* self redirect: data sent by c1 is redirected back to p1 itself */
+ sent = xsend(c1, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, sizeof(buf), "xsend(c1), self"))
+ goto end;
+
+ recvd = recv_timeout(p1, rcv, sizeof(buf), MSG_DONTWAIT, 1);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, sent, "recv_timeout(p1), self"))
+ goto end;
+
/* just trigger sockamp: data sent by c0 will be received by p1 */
sent = xsend(c0, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, sizeof(buf), "xsend(c0), bpf"))
@@ -1364,6 +1373,8 @@ static void test_sockmap_no_verdict_fionread(void)
void test_sockmap_basic(void)
{
+ test_sockmap_copied_seq(false);
+ return;
if (test__start_subtest("sockmap create_update_free"))
test_sockmap_create_update_free(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
if (test__start_subtest("sockhash create_update_free"))
> REDIRECT-to-self should really be a PASS, see [1]. My suggestion - fixup
> the verdict:
>
> if (verdict == __SK_REDIRECT && skb->sk == psock->sk)
> verdict = __SK_PASS;
Agree. It's simple and clear.
+ if (verdict == __SK_REDIRECT && skb_bpf_ingress(skb) &&
+ skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb) == psock->sk)
+ verdict = __SK_PASS;
switch (verdict) {
> Then we can remove the sk_psock_skb_ingress_self call from
> sk_psock_skb_ingress, and kill take_ref param in
> sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue.
>
> John, Jiayuan, thoughts?
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2443ca66676d50a4eb3305c236bccd84a9828ce2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-29 2:00 [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting Geliang Tang
2026-08-29 2:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 11:38 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-09-01 13:00 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-09-04 14:11 ` Geliang Tang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-04 3:03 netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d1e416d-202f-4fcb-85f6-aa380645216f@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox