BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xu Yunxiang" <xyx2021@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v4 2/3] bpf: Propagate referenced dynptr release errors
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:36:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831003608.5A2151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831001552.3223196-3-xyx2021@mail.ustc.edu.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A BPF callback can trigger a kernel panic via WARN_ON_ONCE by destroying a caller-acquired iterator, bypassing verifier boundary checks.
- [High] A BPF callback performing a NULL check on a caller-acquired PTR_MAYBE_NULL reference triggers a kernel panic via WARN_ON_ONCE.
--

commit d4b9f8473b6b567b88014154d968c1bc465a559e
Author: Xu Yunxiang <xyx2021@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
bpf: Propagate referenced dynptr release errors

This commit propagates release_reference() errors in
unmark_stack_slots_dynptr() instead of wrapping them in a WARN_ON_ONCE().
This prevents kernel panics from BPF callbacks trying to release
caller-acquired dynptrs.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260829040110.D6A991F000E9@smtp.kernel.org

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index dbc9cfcffcd60..65ee9afaa5ff0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -838,7 +838,9 @@ static int unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re
>  	 * Mirror destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(), which already invalidates
>  	 * slices by dynptr_id.
>  	 */
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference(env, ref_obj_id));
> +	err = release_reference(env, ref_obj_id);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  	invalidate_slices_of_dynptr(env, state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does unmark_stack_slots_iter()
have the exact same problem?

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:unmark_stack_slots_iter() {
...
		if (i == 0)
			WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference(env, st->ref_obj_id));
...
}

If a caller frame initializes an iterator on its stack and passes a pointer
to this stack slot as the ctx argument to a bpf_loop callback, and the
callback calls bpf_iter_num_destroy(), could the verifier panic the kernel
via this WARN_ON_ONCE (assuming panic_on_warn=1)? 

Since release_reference() would return -EINVAL for a caller's reference,
it seems it would trigger the warning.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does mark_ptr_or_null_regs() also need to
handle cross-frame reference errors instead of warning?

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:mark_ptr_or_null_regs() {
...
	if (ref_obj_id && ref_obj_id == id && is_null)
		/* regs[regno] is in the " == NULL" branch.
		 * No one could have freed the reference state before
		 * doing the NULL check.
		 */
		WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference_state(state, id));
...
}

If a caller acquires a PTR_MAYBE_NULL reference, spills it, and passes a
pointer to it to a bpf_loop callback, and the callback reads the pointer
and performs a NULL check, would release_reference_state() refuse to release
the caller's reference and return -EINVAL? 

If so, this could also trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE and panic the kernel.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831001552.3223196-1-xyx2021@mail.ustc.edu.cn?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31  0:15 [PATCH 6.12.y v4 0/3] bpf: fix dynptr release handling Xu Yunxiang
2026-08-31  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v4 1/3] bpf: Invalidate dynptr slices by dynptr_id on release Xu Yunxiang
2026-08-31  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v4 2/3] bpf: Propagate referenced dynptr release errors Xu Yunxiang
2026-08-31  0:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v4 3/3] bpf: Invalidate dynptr clones in every call frame on release Xu Yunxiang
2026-08-31 11:54 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v4 0/3] bpf: fix dynptr release handling Greg KH
2026-08-31 15:58   ` Xu Yunxiang
2026-08-31 20:15     ` Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831003608.5A2151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xyx2021@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox