BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>,
	kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Check rbtree callback restrictions in subprogs
Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2026 23:47:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903214758.2727663-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903214758.2727663-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Add a verifier failure case where an rbtree comparator enters two nested
static subprograms and the innermost subprogram unlocks and relocks the
tree. Restoring the lock keeps the surrounding callback state balanced,
so the test specifically exercises whether the callback restriction follows
the nested calls.

Also add a load-only positive control whose comparator calls a harmless
static subprogram. This preserves the intended support for verified static
subprogram calls while holding the tree lock.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c
index 803419a47c62..4504608196ab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c
@@ -272,6 +272,47 @@ static bool less__bad_res_spin_unlock(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb
 	return false;
 }
 
+static __noinline void rbtree_cb_unlock_relock(void)
+{
+	bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+	bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+}
+
+static __noinline void rbtree_cb_nested_unlock(void)
+{
+	rbtree_cb_unlock_relock();
+	asm volatile ("");
+}
+
+static bool less__bad_subprog_unlock(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b)
+{
+	struct node_data *node_a;
+	struct node_data *node_b;
+
+	node_a = container_of(a, struct node_data, node);
+	node_b = container_of(b, struct node_data, node);
+	rbtree_cb_nested_unlock();
+
+	return node_a->key < node_b->key;
+}
+
+static __noinline void rbtree_cb_noop(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("");
+}
+
+static bool less__subprog_allowed(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b)
+{
+	struct node_data *node_a;
+	struct node_data *node_b;
+
+	node_a = container_of(a, struct node_data, node);
+	node_b = container_of(b, struct node_data, node);
+	rbtree_cb_noop();
+
+	return node_a->key < node_b->key;
+}
+
 static __always_inline
 long add_with_cb(bool (cb)(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b))
 {
@@ -330,4 +371,18 @@ long rbtree_api_add_bad_cb_res_spin_unlock(void *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("can't spin_{lock,unlock} in rbtree cb")
+long rbtree_api_add_bad_cb_subprog_unlock(void *ctx)
+{
+	return add_with_cb(less__bad_subprog_unlock);
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__success
+long rbtree_api_add_cb_subprog_allowed(void *ctx)
+{
+	return add_with_cb(less__subprog_allowed);
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 21:47 [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 1/8] bpf: Check ancestor frames for rbtree callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:40   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-03 22:56   ` [PATCH bpf v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Check rbtree callback restrictions in subprogs bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 3/8] bpf: Mark bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind() as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:15   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test btf lookup helper sleepability Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 5/8] bpf: Mark faultable stack helpers as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:00   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Check faultable stack helper contexts Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:56   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 7/8] bpf: Reject legacy packet loads from callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:58   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-04  2:22     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04  2:30 ` [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903214758.2727663-3-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kkd@meta.com \
    --cc=npc@anthropic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox