From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Check faultable stack helper contexts
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 23:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903214758.2727663-7-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903214758.2727663-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Add verifier coverage for the sleepable bpf_get_stack() and
bpf_get_task_stack() implementations. Call each helper while preemption is
disabled and require the verifier to reject it as sleepable.
Both programs load when the prototypes lack might_sleep, so the
expected-failure tests fail. Keep success controls outside the
non-preemptible region to ensure ordinary calls from sleepable uprobes
remain valid.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
index 6d5fce7e6ffc..81c459435680 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
@@ -115,6 +115,58 @@ int preempt_sleepable_helper(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__failure __msg("sleepable helper bpf_get_stack#")
+int preempt_sleepable_get_stack(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_get_stack(ctx, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__failure __msg("sleepable helper bpf_get_task_stack#")
+int preempt_sleepable_get_task_stack(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_get_task_stack(task, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__success
+int sleepable_get_stack(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+
+ bpf_get_stack(ctx, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__success
+int sleepable_get_task_stack(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ bpf_get_task_stack(task, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
__failure __msg("kernel func bpf_copy_from_user_str is sleepable within non-preemptible region")
int preempt_sleepable_kfunc(void *ctx)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 21:47 [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 1/8] bpf: Check ancestor frames for rbtree callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Check rbtree callback restrictions in subprogs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 3/8] bpf: Mark bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind() as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test btf lookup helper sleepability Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 5/8] bpf: Mark faultable stack helpers as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-03 22:56 ` [PATCH bpf v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Check faultable stack helper contexts bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 7/8] bpf: Reject legacy packet loads from callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:58 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-04 2:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 2:30 ` [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903214758.2727663-7-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=npc@anthropic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox