[PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst

[PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst

[Karl Mehltretter]

struct bpf_cpmuask does not exist; the name is struct bpf_cpumask.

Use it.

Fixes: 027bdec89364 ("bpf/docs: Document the nocast aliasing behavior of ___init")
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
index 85f73e0bbd0f..57831eda0a33 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ For example, for the following type definition:
 
 The verifier would allow a ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` to be passed to a kfunc
 taking a ``cpumask_t *`` (which is a typedef of ``struct cpumask *``). For
-instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpmuask *`` can be passed
+instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` can be passed
 to bpf_cpumask_test_cpu().
 
 In some cases, this type-aliasing behavior is not desired. ``struct
-- 
2.53.0

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst

[Randy Dunlap]

On 9/5/26 2:55 AM, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> struct bpf_cpmuask does not exist; the name is struct bpf_cpumask.
> 
> Use it.
> 
> Fixes: 027bdec89364 ("bpf/docs: Document the nocast aliasing behavior of ___init")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
> index 85f73e0bbd0f..57831eda0a33 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ For example, for the following type definition:
>  
>  The verifier would allow a ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` to be passed to a kfunc
>  taking a ``cpumask_t *`` (which is a typedef of ``struct cpumask *``). For
> -instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpmuask *`` can be passed
> +instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` can be passed
>  to bpf_cpumask_test_cpu().
>  
>  In some cases, this type-aliasing behavior is not desired. ``struct

-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst

[Karl Mehltretter]

Superseded by the combined v2 with the btf_var patch:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260906222656.3459-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com/

Thanks,
Karl