From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Harshitha Ramamurthy" <hramamurthy@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 08/12] gve: split up notify block allocation and setup paths
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:11:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910191157.BCC421F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909191136.3811892-9-hramamurthy@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing cancel_work_sync() for stats_report_task leads to NULL Pointer Dereference during device teardown.
--
commit c59c716d20178f6c3e44afb298f8d5eeb8f487be
Author: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
gve: split up notify block allocation and setup paths
Before this patch, notify block allocation and setup occurred in the same
method. This all occurred before gve_adminq_configure_device_resources,
which populates the irq_db_indicies array, a DMA region with BAR offsets
for MSI-X vectors.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
> index cc27141240fd1..d2f974a0cc877 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -749,6 +758,7 @@ static void gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(struct gve_priv *priv)
>
> static void gve_teardown_device(struct gve_priv *priv)
> {
> + gve_teardown_notify_blocks(priv);
> gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(priv);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the device teardown path properly
cancel the stats_report_task?
If a user enables stats reporting while the interface is down,
stats_report_timer is armed and enqueues stats_report_task into the
workqueue. If the device is subsequently unbound, gve_teardown_device()
calls gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(), which eventually calls
gve_free_stats_report().
In drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c:gve_free_stats_report():
timer_delete_sync(&priv->stats_report_timer);
dma_free_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev, priv->stats_report_len,
priv->stats_report, priv->stats_report_bus);
priv->stats_report = NULL;
This deletes the timer and frees the memory, but leaves the pending task in
the workqueue.
Then gve_remove() continues and flushes the workqueue:
gve_teardown_device(priv);
destroy_workqueue(priv->gve_wq);
When the workqueue is flushed, stats_report_task will execute
gve_handle_report_stats(), which dereferences priv->stats_report:
void gve_handle_report_stats(struct gve_priv *priv)
{
struct stats *stats = priv->stats_report->stats;
Could this lead to a NULL pointer dereference? Should cancel_work_sync() be
called on stats_report_task before freeing priv->stats_report?
> gve_adminq_free(priv);
> /*
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909191136.3811892-1-hramamurthy@google.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 19:11 [PATCH net-next v6 00/12] gve: AdminQ mode related refactors Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/12] gve: add struct gve_device_info to hold device properties Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 22:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-11 0:23 ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/12] gve: introduce control plane operations structure Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/12] gve: introduce ctrl ops to set vectors and Qs Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/12] gve: introduce gve_adminq_get_device_properties() Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 22:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-11 0:58 ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/12] gve: refactor gve_init_priv for reset path Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 22:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-11 1:06 ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/12] gve: simplify reset logic Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 22:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-11 20:31 ` Joshua Washington
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/12] gve: add gve_ctrl_ops for gve initialization/teardown sequences Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/12] gve: split up notify block allocation and setup paths Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 19:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/12] gve: introduce new methods to handle IRQ doorbells Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 22:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/12] gve: setup and teardown management interrupts Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/12] gve: add ctrl ops for queue operations Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-09 19:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/12] gve: add link status/speed ctrl ops Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-09-10 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910191157.BCC421F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox