BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for by-value arguments up to 16 bytes
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:50:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911155015.2011762-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911154914.2004336-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Extend the by-value argument test with the aggregate cases, written in C
so that they depend on the compiler lowering the argument into a pair of
argument registers rather than on a hand-written register layout.

The programs cover a struct and a union that fill two registers, a
smaller struct that fills one, and two struct arguments in a row,
alongside the __int128 already there. Each has an int argument around it
so that a wrong slot count shows up as a wrong value in the parameters
beside it; two pairs leave room for only one, which follows them. A
global function taking a struct with a pointer member is rejected: the
callee would receive the pointer as an opaque scalar.

A struct the argument registers cannot hold reaches the callee partly on
the stack, which the interpreter does not implement, so that case is
loaded only when the JIT is on.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_aggregate_arg.c        | 165 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_aggregate_arg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_aggregate_arg.c
index fc7c1b18bc40..b0ecccede47e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_aggregate_arg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_aggregate_arg.c
@@ -7,6 +7,131 @@
 #define MIX_A	0xdeadbeefcafef00dULL
 #define MIX_B	0x0123456789abcdefULL
 
+struct pair {
+	__u64 lo;
+	__u64 hi;
+};
+
+struct small {
+	__u32 a;
+	__u32 b;
+};
+
+union upair {
+	__u64 halves[2];
+	struct {
+		__u64 lo;
+		__u64 hi;
+	} parts;
+};
+
+struct with_ptr {
+	void *p;
+	__u64 x;
+};
+
+static __noinline __u64 take_pair(int a, struct pair p, int c)
+{
+	return (__u64)a + p.lo + p.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_static_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+	struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+
+	if (take_pair(1, p, 2) != a + b + 3)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#if defined(__clang__)
+
+__noinline __u64 take_pair_global(int a, struct pair p, int c)
+{
+	return (__u64)a + p.lo + p.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+	struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+
+	if (take_pair_global(1, p, 2) != a + b + 3)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_two_pairs_global(struct pair p, struct pair q, int d)
+{
+	return p.lo + p.hi + q.lo + q.hi + d;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_two_structs_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+	struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+	struct pair q = { .lo = a + 1, .hi = b + 2 };
+
+	if (take_two_pairs_global(p, q, 3) != 2 * a + 2 * b + 6)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_small_global(int a, struct small s, int c)
+{
+	return (__u64)a + s.a + s.b + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_small_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u32 a = skb->len ^ (__u32)MIX_A;
+	__u32 b = skb->len ^ (__u32)MIX_B;
+	struct small s = { .a = a, .b = b };
+
+	if (take_small_global(1, s, 2) != (__u64)a + b + 3)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_upair_global(int a, union upair u, int c)
+{
+	return (__u64)a + u.parts.lo + u.parts.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+	union upair u;
+
+	u.halves[0] = a;
+	u.halves[1] = b;
+	if (take_upair_global(1, u, 2) != a + b + 3)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
 #ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
 
 typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
@@ -32,4 +157,44 @@ int aggregate_arg_int128_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 
 #endif /* __SIZEOF_INT128__ */
 
+#if defined(__BPF_FEATURE_STACK_ARGUMENT)
+
+static __noinline __u64 take_spilled_pair(int a, int b, int c, int d, struct pair p)
+{
+	return (__u64)a + b + c + d + p.lo + p.hi;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__arch_x86_64 __arch_arm64
+__load_if_JITed()
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_spilled_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+	struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+	int n = skb->len;
+
+	if (take_spilled_pair(n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3, p) != a + b + 4 * n + 6)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+__noinline __u64 take_with_ptr_global(struct with_ptr s)
+{
+	return s.x;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("type STRUCT in take_with_ptr_global() is not composed of scalars")
+int aggregate_arg_ptr_member_fail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct with_ptr s = { .p = skb, .x = skb->len };
+
+	return take_with_ptr_global(s);
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 15:49 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Read a kfunc's __sz argument only when it is in a register Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] selftests/bpf: Add a test for an __int128 by-value argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12 17:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Rename bpf_subprog_info::arg_cnt to arg_slot_cnt Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Index global function arguments by argument slot Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Support by-value struct arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Support __int128 as a by-value function argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Rename bpf_call_summary::num_params to arg_slot_cnt Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Recognize by-value struct and __int128 kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12 17:13     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Prepare kfunc arguments for the JIT from an ABI description Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf, x86: Move kfunc arguments into the x86-64 calling convention Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12 17:14     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf, arm64: Move kfunc arguments into the arm64 " Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 17:16     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12 17:19     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:50 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm tests for by-value arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for by-value kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12 17:24     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 15:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Temporary hack to disable register mismatch in arm64 Yonghong Song
2026-09-11 16:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-12  3:57   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-12 17:30     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911155015.2011762-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox