BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/21] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:01:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926050102.2218021-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926050006.2213110-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

arch_bpf_stack_walk_ra() is the ORC walk with the return-address slot
alongside each frame, which unwind_get_return_address_ptr() already hands
out; writing there is what redirects a frame to its landing pad. The
feature is gated on CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC for the same reason
arch_bpf_stack_walk() is -- there is no other unwinder here to ask.

aux->epilogue_ip comes for free: the JIT already emits one epilogue per
(sub)program and every other exit jumps to it, so the offset it keeps as
ctx->cleanup_addr, as a native address, is it. That field has always been
the epilogue and has nothing to do with the cleanup pads despite the name.

The rest is bookkeeping: build the native cleanup table from the JIT's
addrs[] once the image is final, and emit an ENDBR at each pad head.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 6c7a0578760e..fb7e8ca1aab2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2150,7 +2150,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *
 				dst_reg = X86_REG_R9;
 		}
 
-		if (bpf_insn_is_indirect_target(env, bpf_prog, i - 1))
+		if (bpf_insn_is_indirect_target(env, bpf_prog, i - 1) ||
+		    bpf_exc_insn_is_pad(env, bpf_prog, i - 1))
 			EMIT_ENDBR();
 
 		ip = image + addrs[i - 1] + (prog - temp);
@@ -3278,6 +3279,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *
 			seen_exit = true;
 			/* Update cleanup_addr */
 			ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen;
+			/* Where an unwind sends a frame with no pad. */
+			bpf_prog->aux->epilogue_ip = (u64)image + proglen;
 			if (bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog) &&
 			    !ns_capable_noaudit(&init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
 				if (emit_spectre_bhb_barrier(&prog, ip, bpf_prog))
@@ -4455,6 +4458,13 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr
 		 */
 		bpf_prog_update_insn_ptrs(prog, addrs, image);
 
+		/*
+		 * Same mapping, consumed by the bpf_unwind() walk:
+		 * turn the cleanup records into native address ranges now
+		 * that the image is final.
+		 */
+		bpf_exc_fill_native_ranges(prog, addrs, image);
+
 		/*
 		 * ctx.prog_offset is used when CFI preambles put code *before*
 		 * the function. See emit_cfi(). For FineIBT specifically this code
@@ -4593,6 +4603,11 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_exceptions(void)
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC);
 }
 
+bool bpf_jit_supports_cleanup_pads(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC);
+}
+
 bool bpf_jit_supports_private_stack(void)
 {
 	return true;
@@ -4614,6 +4629,24 @@ void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp
 #endif
 }
 
+void arch_bpf_stack_walk_ra(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp, u64 *ra),
+			    void *cookie)
+{
+#if defined(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC)
+	struct unwind_state state;
+	unsigned long addr, *ra;
+
+	for (unwind_start(&state, current, NULL, NULL); !unwind_done(&state);
+	     unwind_next_frame(&state)) {
+		addr = unwind_get_return_address(&state);
+		ra = unwind_get_return_address_ptr(&state);
+		if (!addr || !ra ||
+		    !consume_fn(cookie, (u64)addr, (u64)state.sp, (u64)state.bp, (u64 *)ra))
+			break;
+	}
+#endif
+}
+
 void bpf_arch_poke_desc_update(struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke,
 			       struct bpf_prog *new, struct bpf_prog *old)
 {
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  5:00 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/21] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/21] bpf: Pack bpf_insn_aux_data flags into bit fields Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/21] bpf: Accept the compiler's exception cleanup table at program load Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/21] bpf: Add the bpf_unwind() and bpf_unwind_resume() kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/21] bpf: Add lookups for exception cleanup resumes and landing pads Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/21] bpf: Prepare for an exception cleanup table before the CFG walk Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 23:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:01     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/21] bpf: Make exception landing pads reachable in the CFG Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  0:02     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/21] bpf: Resume a covered call at its landing pad Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  8:21     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-27  0:04       ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27  0:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:17     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/21] bpf: Refuse a landing pad that does not resume Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  3:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/21] bpf: Refuse a private stack for a program with an exception cleanup table Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/21] bpf: Dispatch cleanup pads by rewriting return addresses Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  1:08     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-26  5:15   ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/21] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  4:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:10     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/21] bpf, arm64: " Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/21] libbpf: Resolve the compiler's _Unwind_Resume to the kernel's kfunc Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/21] libbpf: Add cleanup_info to bpf_prog_load_opts Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/21] libbpf: Collect .bpf_cleanup records and pass them to the kernel Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:28     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/21] libbpf: Carry the exception cleanup table through the light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/21] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/21] selftests/bpf: Add an end-to-end .bpf_cleanup exception test Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 19/21] selftests/bpf: Add __set_global() and __ret_global() test tags Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  4:58     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:36     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 20/21] selftests/bpf: Cover the exception cleanup shapes the chain does not reach Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:49     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/21] selftests/bpf: Load an exception cleanup program from a light skeleton Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260926050102.2218021-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox